Re: [Softwires] map-t to proposed standard rather than experimental

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 12 November 2014 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF3C1A1A98 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:14:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtF1t_US7bqs for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:14:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B4971A1A6D for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:14:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E393DA01AA for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:13:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD6953E07E; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:13:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-8953.meeting.ietf.org (31.133.137.83) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:13:40 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <DD4AE883-EE52-4C36-A4AC-9845D07FCF8A@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:13:36 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <0B75160F-DE41-4102-9047-59C97BE35D37@nominum.com>
References: <04453287-AE2D-47DF-80FF-2C717AE1B23E@nominum.com> <DD4AE883-EE52-4C36-A4AC-9845D07FCF8A@cisco.com>
To: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [31.133.137.83]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/4i-hbKShX7m2onCNHKCpYsZa_XQ
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] map-t to proposed standard rather than experimental
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:14:12 -0000

On Nov 11, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) <rajiva@cisco.com> wrote:
> Could we not combine the LC and the question in 1-go? 

The problem with that is that the chairs (and the IESG!) would like to get the assent of the working group to make this change, and that has to be complete before the IETF last call can start.