IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6

Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com> Thu, 16 February 2012 04:20 UTC

Return-Path: <fibrib@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF6421F8574 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:20:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.241, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rlgSepE7YBQt for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:20:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309DE21F852B for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:20:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qafi29 with SMTP id i29so3890053qaf.10 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:20:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=D/NqVOA2OXxLK2crod6Gv2kYMGO/8kbMYVCdwbjizUQ=; b=Kkp4/umZFhBT2TCpUueW3bhd4n2WfAbo2SM95kjKiY9pf2bgHfLnnhq/t7xVBfSDVU iLLxEPmWbnmkTbvYvhfWTTDd+4GCkIRdVgTAiXwDqGTE+Ka/lcZDtZ7DrVmnVOYqqn2U wUw8/4RONDsE7hGfhIQBXS/0vTPdvFbDqex2E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.78.145 with SMTP id l17mr689997qck.141.1329366045724; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.11.144 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:20:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CB61E7C0.1CA20%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
References: <CAFUBMqU6DwZr6SJsKDGWy+hTXks_XEt9WFBGfr9DzmaMHYQFAA@mail.gmail.com> <CB61E7C0.1CA20%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:20:45 +0900
Message-ID: <CAFUBMqUGQB-+rTOuLyKdTmXHxdoqAN7NfuxC4ZGS_VhUKsxKUA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com>
To: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@cable.comcast.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="002354470b84ee937e04b90d266c"
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:20:50 -0000

2012/2/16 Lee, Yiu <Yiu_Lee@cable.comcast.com>

> Hi Maoke,
>
> There are always trade-offs. We can suggest few options and ask the WG to
> choose one.
>

good point. acceptable. :) - maoke


>
> 1) Let the host to reassemble the fragmented packets
> 2) Let the 4o6 TC to assemble the fragmented packets
> 3) Don’t suggest anything and leave this open for implementation
>
> /Yiu
>
>
> From: Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:50:33 +0900
> To: "Yiu L. LEE" <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
> Cc: Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com>, "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6
>
> the "since we believe" is true in the term that client/server model is
> dominating the Internet usage. but the situation is changing, AFTR might
> suffer a heavy burden with reassembly in the environment where p2p is
> dominating. can we (actually you authors) surely state lightweight 4over6
> improves this? if we can, it is a happy point. ;-)
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email