[Softwires] DS-Lite I-D progress (was RE: dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased against static port sharing)
<mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com> Wed, 23 February 2011 16:19 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553C53A6A28 for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:19:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.177
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.177 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3grWWjT16TsQ for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:19:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C52D3A6A26 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:19:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm12.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 3C74F18C467; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:19:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PUEXCH41.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.30]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 1E184238055; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:19:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.13]) by PUEXCH41.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.30]) with mapi; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:19:46 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com
To: 'Alain Durand' <adurand@juniper.net>, "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:19:45 +0100
Thread-Topic: DS-Lite I-D progress (was RE: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased against static port sharing)
Thread-Index: Acs/DkvRmzD5iylRRe2E7UDqla6fgyUZrQqg
Message-ID: <24061_1298477986_4D6533A2_24061_72547_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F33C4BD04448@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: Your message of Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:22:30 +0200. <24280_1281601351_4C63AF47_24280_1087_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F312F6F9EB2D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <201008181948.o7IJm8EZ000868@givry.fdupont.fr>
In-Reply-To: <201008181948.o7IJm8EZ000868@givry.fdupont.fr>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.2.23.153317
Cc: Softwires <softwires@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: [Softwires] DS-Lite I-D progress (was RE: dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased against static port sharing)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:19:01 -0000
Dear Alain, Yiu, Is there any plan to update the DS-Lite draft to take into account the comments received so far and to make this document progress? Cheers, Med -----Message d'origine----- De : Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr [mailto:Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr] Envoyé : mercredi 18 août 2010 21:48 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP Cc : Rémi Després; Softwires; Ralph Droms Objet : Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased against static port sharing In your previous mail you wrote: We have raised this point during the last call which has been issued on version 03 of the draft and suggested to remove this section from the draft since it is not normative and also because this depends on the taste of each SP and their deployment context. A reference to http://tools.ietf.org/html/ draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-01#page-22 would be sufficient IMHO. "Dynamic vs. Static" and "Port set vs. Individual ports" discussion can be elaborated further in draft-intarea-shared-addressing-issues if required. => IMHO it is the best option (and to make the draft smaller is a good goal :-). Thanks Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr ******************************************************************************** IMPORTANT.Les informations contenues dans ce message electronique y compris les fichiers attaches sont strictement confidentielles et peuvent etre protegees par la loi. Ce message electronique est destine exclusivement au(x) destinataire(s) mentionne(s) ci-dessus. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur ou s il ne vous est pas destine, veuillez immediatement le signaler a l expediteur et effacer ce message et tous les fichiers eventuellement attaches. Toute lecture, exploitation ou transmission des informations contenues dans ce message est interdite. Tout message electronique est susceptible d alteration. A ce titre, le Groupe France Telecom decline toute responsabilite notamment s il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. De meme, il appartient au destinataire de s assurer de l absence de tout virus. IMPORTANT.This e-mail message and any attachments are strictly confidential and may be protected by law. This message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message. Any unauthorized view, usage or disclosure ofthis message is prohibited. Since e-mail messages may not be reliable, France Telecom Group shall not be liable for any message if modified, changed or falsified. Additionally the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. ********************************************************************************
- [Softwires] I-D Action:draft-ietf-softwire-dual-s… Internet-Drafts
- [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased again… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Ralph Droms
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Alain Durand
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Ralph Droms
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Alain Durand
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Yiu L. Lee
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Francis Dupont
- [Softwires] DS-Lite I-D progress (was RE: dual-st… mohamed.boucadair