Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-11.txt
"Leaf Yeh" <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com> Fri, 06 March 2015 06:45 UTC
Return-Path: <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CFB1ACCEE for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 22:45:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_74=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CH4LcIIYZqkM for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 22:45:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x232.google.com (mail-ie0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4171ACCE5 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 22:45:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iebtr6 with SMTP id tr6so10053680ieb.4 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:45:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=Zuhf9AsHOdUCxaBVLi5j1Z7wyBEcTuEAgKAK/cVa5d8=; b=kS75ocyNh+JeRacwaGqNUHItOASXnhIxXIeQTwieyUCdlmDZfAkbxH+4LoJi/t7Y1c 4eiEOUig9O0g2dyNYosKdxRwVIJe8Nt7VDHGIPy1I1cxyuEMjYH75YiPj2X1rUBsIDmo /yxitjnX0C6vrD3JiVigXy/e8YIvgXyHzUpTSV9v6FY+B+EmHCjliUZ1GeDHRuC+JAiU 6HlD0svEjk6GLu3oJ2Mvtzo4s4Ow5JJSNoUVJ9M2JyTDWfsvXG4bPAuCS9VQL5uzEOyz VvA8vKXMLbyRwrYxcI7t+8lj0StdfTpK34jENrJFSrPaeGSZWsFoN/RqWlW5EJtRIb9k rIUg==
X-Received: by 10.107.170.33 with SMTP id t33mr11584368ioe.7.1425624328444; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PC ([218.241.109.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n17sm541224igi.2.2015.03.05.22.45.25 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54f94d08.1121320a.5027.152a@mx.google.com>
X-Google-Original-Message-ID: <024801d057d9$4ff2db20$efd89160$@yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
From: Leaf Yeh <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
To: 'Ole Troan' <ot@cisco.com>, 'Tomasz Mrugalski' <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
References: <20141114095154.19022.64483.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141114095154.19022.64483.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:46:41 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac//8KTZI3NQhYX6S3CgcogioPeglBXzltfw
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/817BNvwO7XtbqeqHzvn7RDNOk8Q>
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-11.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 06:45:31 -0000
Nits found in draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-11:
a. In sec. 4.4, "o option-length: 4"
Per the format defined for OPTION_S46_V4V6BIND, the value of the
option-length should be variable. I guess the above text is wrongly copied
from other place.
b. In sec. 4.5,
" The OPTION_S46_PORTPARAMS option with an
explicit PSID MUST be discarded if the S46 CE isn't configured with a
full IPv4 address (e.g. IPv4 prefix)."
I prefer to replace the above "a full IPv4 address" to be "a shared IPv4
address". We can get the address sharing information from the calculation on
the 'ea-len' and 'prefix4-len' got from OPTION_S46_RULE, i.e. PSID-length =
q = o - p = o - (32-r) != 0. Right?
c. In sec. 4.1,
" o F-Flag: 1 bit field that specifies whether the rule is to be used
for forwarding (FMR). If set, this rule is used as a FMR, if not
set this rule is a BMR only and MUST NOT be used for forwarding.
Note: A BMR can also be used as an FMR for forwarding if the
F-flag is set. The BMR rule is determined by a longest-prefix
match of the Rule-IPv6-prefix against the End-User IPv6
prefix(es)."
I guess if F-Flag=0, i.e. not set, this rule is a BMR only, and is not a
FMR. That might means hub & spoke mode, right? If yes, I guess we need more
words on the hub & spoke mode in this section. Right?
d. In sec. 8,
" Such
a client MUST include the S46 Container option(s) that it is
configured for in its ORO in SOLICIT, REQUEST, RENEW, REBIND and
INFORMATION-REQUEST messages. "
I prefer the above words could be " Such a client MUST include the codes of
the S46 Container option(s)...in its ORO...".
e. In sec. 4.5,
" o offset: (PSID offset) 8 bits long field that specifies the numeric
value for the S46 algorithm's excluded port range/offset bits
(A-bits), as per section 5.1.1 of [I-D.ietf-softwire-map]. "
I prefer to replace the above "A-bits " to be "a-bits" per
I-D.ietf-softwire-map. 'A' looks like the value in the field, while 'a' is
the number of the bits.
f. In sec. 4.4,
" o bind-ipv6-prefix: a variable length field specifying the IPv6
prefix or address for the S46. "
I prefer to replace the above "the S46" to be "the S46 CE". Right?
g. In sec. 3,
" MAP-E uses RFC2473 [RFC2473] IPv4 over IPv6 tunnelling,
while MAP-T uses NAT64 [RFC6145] based translation."
We only need 1x RFC2473 here. :-)
Best Regards,
Leaf
-----Original Message-----
From: Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 5:52 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-11.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF.
Title : DHCPv6 Options for configuration of Softwire
Address and Port Mapped Clients
Authors : Tomek Mrugalski
Ole Troan
Ian Farrer
Simon Perreault
Wojciech Dec
Congxiao Bao
Leaf Y. Yeh
Xiaohong Deng
Filename : draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-11.txt
Pages : 18
Date : 2014-11-14
Abstract:
This document specifies DHCPv6 options, termed Softwire46 options,
for the provisioning of Softwire46 Customer Edge (CE) devices.
Softwire46 is a collective term used to refer to architectures based
on the notion of IPv4 Address+Port (A+P) for providing IPv4
connectivity across an IPv6 network.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-11
A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-11
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires