Re: [Softwires] Stateless implementation plan

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Wed, 08 February 2012 08:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D95E21F8757 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:46:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AlIKOysSREPG for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF0A21F865B for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:46:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yenm3 with SMTP id m3so105337yen.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:46:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iitJJqxV403WtzQQL5OBPpgSS2youa/qieMKeeWyyKo=; b=biwcEOrCrGAGJCKqU2Di7DtYCG5+dSRqumlrtH3s92XL6HyBJC179+ZbzB8EGL3NmW vGjftnPTXmnaTPlwGQPiA6jlr6sxISAuJJmijPUxPfSvG9pIzuNeO6EiyiRt6AiOGdfB awVTU8c5onoWKO/TqxEtHETU8owufE4PU4RMA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.141.9 with SMTP id t9mr10934114ann.42.1328690764235; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:46:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.170.163 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:46:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGS7TBhUVJjwjqMibXJRo1Y=F4UKcDmYXfh-9OUDe=Me0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD6AjGTfQ4akndGG3C9k7SZU=4BpuA4qrorg1FeV5u8wEJRdaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGS7TBhUVJjwjqMibXJRo1Y=F4UKcDmYXfh-9OUDe=Me0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:46:04 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAccCa_6g-LQRvfx2MSNDFH09Vb_kjBHSVk6-5uiTUTYX_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Stateless implementation plan
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:46:08 -0000

Hi Cameron,
4rd solution IMHO is more suitable for a fixed network. CPE in 4rd is
not appropriate to be hosted in a UE.

I think your solution 464XLAT's mobile part is way better for your
purposes. There you can put all your IPv4 resources on the PLAT box so
that CLAT box is kept simpler.

In 4rd, CPEs have A+P and BR is kept "stateless" these are not so
useful for your purposes, I think.

Regards,

Behcet


On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are the map and 4rd solutions deployable for existing networks that do not
> have reserves  of ipv4 ?  My assumption is that these solutions target
> existing networks that have meaningful growth and they need a v6 solution.
>
> If yes, how? Any pointers within the reams of drafts I should look for?
>
> In my brief and simple skimming, it appears to me that setting up one of
> these solutions would require me to collapse my existing network to harvest
> back the addresses so that they may be redeployed in map.
>
> What would the deployment process be for an address exhausted network of 10
> million subs with 10% annual growth be?
>
> Cb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>