Re: [Softwires] Stateless implementation plan

Hi Cameron,
4rd solution IMHO is more suitable for a fixed network. CPE in 4rd is
not appropriate to be hosted in a UE.

I think your solution 464XLAT's mobile part is way better for your
purposes. There you can put all your IPv4 resources on the PLAT box so
that CLAT box is kept simpler.

In 4rd, CPEs have A+P and BR is kept "stateless" these are not so
useful for your purposes, I think.

Regards,

Behcet

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are the map and 4rd solutions deployable for existing networks that do not
> have reserves  of ipv4 ?  My assumption is that these solutions target
> existing networks that have meaningful growth and they need a v6 solution.
>
> If yes, how? Any pointers within the reams of drafts I should look for?
>
> In my brief and simple skimming, it appears to me that setting up one of
> these solutions would require me to collapse my existing network to harvest
> back the addresses so that they may be redeployed in map.
>
> What would the deployment process be for an address exhausted network of 10
> million subs with 10% annual growth be?
>
> Cb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>