Re: [Softwires] MAP and 4rd - Relationship with Single translation

Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn> Fri, 09 March 2012 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBA521F85BB for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 23:17:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OltPnNdOzdr8 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 23:17:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cernet.edu.cn (cernet.edu.cn [202.112.39.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1255221F85AE for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 23:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [202.38.102.1]) by centos (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf3ArUQPGrVlPHkMQAA--.3219S2; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:14:15 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <4F59AE74.4090204@cernet.edu.cn>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:17:08 +0800
From: Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
References: <B140D6B2-1B19-43D7-9B63-6BEA83CEB164@juniper.net> <3AAD65F3-5169-49B7-9698-E820EF419B35@employees.org> <171F46DF-2C26-48A8-BE2D-D859C9DE43E9@laposte.net> <8A238676-62B7-4A8B-8986-B24A964CFD9B@juniper.net> <29D1D1C9-CC1E-4F92-81BC-81ECC3402C47@laposte.net> <63E186D0-B49E-4AB4-93C1-C6C7412519E8@laposte.net> <96214733-7D45-436E-81C2-6E6701542C79@employees.org> <4F348EEB.4050908@cernet.edu.cn> <86ABDF99-789A-47D3-AD70-476F998E31AE@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <86ABDF99-789A-47D3-AD70-476F998E31AE@laposte.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020104050001070803070303"
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf3ArUQPGrVlPHkMQAA--.3219S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7tF4xKF4xCw4rKF18tFWUJwb_yoW8CF4fpF W3GrsYya9rKr40yrnruw4fCw1rAFWkK3y5Jw1UGw1vyws8WayjvrW5KF9Ik3yfXr1rXw1j q3yjkrs8Xan5AFJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUhE14x267AKxVWUJVW8JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l84ACjc xK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28E F7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWxJr0_GcWle2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4 xG6c804VAFz4xC04v7McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1l F7xvr2IY64vIr41lF7I21c0EjII2zVCS5cI20VAGYxC7Mx8GjcxK6IxK0xIIj40E5I8Crw CYjI0SjxkI62AI1cAE67vIY487MxkIecxEwVAFwVW8CwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwC20s02 6c02F40E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF 0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rW3Jr0E3s1lIxAIcVC2z280 aVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0x ZFpf9x0JUt8n5UUUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: p0lqwqxfhu0vvwohv3gofq/
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP and 4rd - Relationship with Single translation
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 07:17:27 -0000

Hi, Remi,

于 2012/2/10 18:23, Rémi Després 写道:
> Hi Xing,
> Good to have you coming in the (unfinished) technical analysis.
>
> I answered to Ole on his remarks, which you support, but not on 
> the following:
>
> You propose to have a line on "IPv4 to IPv6 communication (single 
> translation) supported", wit
>
> Let me therefore reiterate the wish to see an ISP use case, with its 
> Mapping rules, and with IPv6 prefixes of CEs that illustrate the 
> problem you see.

The CERNET2 is an IPv6-only core network. We provide stateless IPv4/IPv6 
translation between CERNET2 and the IPv4 core network (CERNET). The 
users can either use single translation directly, or add their own 
IPv4/IPv6 translor if double translation is required.

Is this answer your question?

Regards,

xing


>
> Regards,
> RD
>
>
>
>
> Le 2012-02-10 à 04:28, Xing Li a écrit :
> ...| | | | |
>>>>    |  5 | IPv6 web caches work for IPv4        |  Y  |  N  |  Y  |  N  |
>>>>    |    | packets                              |     |     |     |     |
>>> suggest you rename to "IPv4 to IPv6 communication (single translation) supported"
>>>
>>
>> (2) More clarification should be added here. I am not sure 4rd-H can 
>> support single translation.
>>
>> (a) According to (1), 4rd-H does not perform header translation 
>> defined by RFC6145.
>>
>> (b) In the softwire mailing list, it seems that 4rd-H cannot support 
>> single translation.  See the thread containing 
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg03324.html 
>> and other posts.
>>
>> (c) If 4rd-H cannot support single translation, then "IPv6 web caches 
>> work for IPv4 packets" requires special configurations, it cannot do 
>> IPv6 web caches for non 4rd-H packets.
>
> ...
>
>> (5) I would like to see the details of how 4rd-H handles ICMP and 
>> ICMP error messages. In the softwire mailing list there were some 
>> discussions. See the thread containing 
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg03324.html 
>> and other posts.Please add
>>
>> | 17 | Handle ICMP (RFC6145) | Y | n/a | ? | ? |
> ...
>