Re: [Softwires] 4rd Address Mapping - version-01

[Jacni Qin <[e-mail]>]

hi,

On 10/19/2011 10:00 AM, Maoke wrote:
> hi Jacni,
>
> 2011/10/19 Jacni Qin <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>
>     there is still another issue, the MAX PSID. personally i like the
>     algorithm of making longest-match for the PSID. however, the
>     position of the PSID is somehow a problem. in the step 2) (or a
>     little before), when you setting the delegated prefix length, this
>     length only covers the IPv4 suffix and the PSID itself, right?
>     The Max PSID idea has been dropped by restoring the parameter "L",
>     in each rule.
>
>
> then it is a parameter in configuration or embedded into the address 
> format?
It's a parameter in the rule.

> a single value over the domain or possible variable among different 
> shared IPv4 addresses? (to my understanding, one address should have a 
> common value of PSID length for all the CEs sharing the address, right?)
The number of L equals the number of Delegated Prefixes of different 
lengths totally within a given domain, which should be determined during 
IPv6 address planning.



Cheers,
Jacni

>
> thanks and regards,
> maoke
>
>
>
>     Cheers,
>     Jacni
>
>