IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] UDP zero-checksum in IPv4

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Thu, 10 March 2016 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80CB12DB11; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:41:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B1MA-s-qY99D; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx143.netapp.com (mx143.netapp.com [216.240.21.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34A3F12DAA4; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:41:40 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,316,1455004800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="101880457"
Received: from hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.38]) by mx143-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2016 09:36:39 -0800
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:36:39 -0800
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::2562:be45:d6a5:1743%21]) with mapi id 15.00.1156.000; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:36:39 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "Poscic, Kristian (Nokia - US)" <kristian.poscic@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: UDP zero-checksum in IPv4
Thread-Index: AdF68bLe5SvLau+lRPK5dqDoIJSUhwARMDWA
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:36:39 +0000
Message-ID: <3F71FEFD-65AC-4158-B923-E11D1924E18F@netapp.com>
References: <7921F977B17D5B49B8DCC955A339D2F0BEA21EC5@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <7921F977B17D5B49B8DCC955A339D2F0BEA21EC5@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.34]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_10DCC4CE-F627-450C-BD98-BEF856948BBB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/Ct1fkrD8bQ4t9cLD1EoljUwIreE>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:20:53 -0800
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "tsv-area@ietf.org" <tsv-area@ietf.org>, "maprg@irtf.org" <maprg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] UDP zero-checksum in IPv4
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:41:41 -0000

CC maprg

On 2016-03-10, at 18:29, Poscic, Kristian (Nokia - US) <kristian.poscic@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Does anyone have any info on the percentage of UDP packets with zero-checksum
> for IPv4 packets in today’s networks (enterprise, internet, any network).
> Seems like there is not a whole lot of info about this on the WEB. Anyone has any firsthand/realworld experience with this? Thanks.
> 
> Kris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email