IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] Mail regarding draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius

" Yu Fu " <eleven711711@foxmail.com> Wed, 27 February 2019 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <eleven711711@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F720130DE9; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:49:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XwY9iXWhv-UG; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpbg64.qq.com (smtpbg62.qq.com [103.7.29.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6C6130DC0; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:49:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1551239375; bh=5z4XAoTpm4aSLqYGxU7xuDeqg1CL1tBAa6eLP7EE370=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Message-ID; b=CQSIitipXjag9J+EnQ376cWY9PwLmbVTDoJmyD/px9w7bGUrJ/tx7BaJF2vWI9VK4 Y2ggk0w1DgBv2zRBbYAu9HP9BWHxqZWY4R6KEvLJKxeIfKOdRRR9oaYEWmiUP14epb LxmjuXv49rtkK7d8b3r/woPcl0fM5OJYNxv7AT68=
X-QQ-FEAT: XoWZfUq5xBjd9uqWl+94ruBhMzzeNgw1U6xRg+MMO5BHcir6uy6QWNI8RRb4Q ogqb7+ajLThqIvHuS5+jmeL6lS2DHrb320stK/EScfvJH/XyNhs2E96m8KT3ll1IwLd4nmx WICQmhwM0eFF7ro/ZWeZU791l8s736V1S/eMZRSvzK4m0FIhZL6PzXq+qtYQfzseU6J73FV A6qS+bZhm5vLM9upDrrQocLpJcSXNJTn8rLeMveEUFqJjknjeJ3Fa7GAf88YB6Hb8z3S6/o 34k7X/sfLkK2mwdNvH45/dh4gFeKxOFhB0QA==
X-QQ-SSF: 000000000000000000000000000000Z
X-HAS-ATTACH: no
X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2
X-Originating-IP: 202.45.105.15
In-Reply-To: <73FB1B3C-A911-41A2-BC01-54C1655E9645@tsinghua.edu.cn>
References: <73FB1B3C-A911-41A2-BC01-54C1655E9645@tsinghua.edu.cn>
X-QQ-STYLE:
X-QQ-mid: webmail9t1551239373t2472901
From: Yu Fu <eleven711711@foxmail.com>
To: cuiyong <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>, draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius <draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius@ietf.org>
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>, cuiyong <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>, ifarrer <ifarrer@me.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_5C7608CC_097469C0_7F7B3664"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:49:32 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <tencent_F4149F091BE4D07FD5BB1CDD42A9BD58610A@qq.com>
X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent
X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-ReplyHash: 2760124130
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Received: from qq.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with SMTP id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:49:34 +0800 (CST)
Feedback-ID: webmail:foxmail.com:bgweb:bgweb115
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/GjYmcqJ8za_y4hOMMhgA4p9PiUM>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Mail regarding draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 03:49:43 -0000

Hi Chairs,


I am not aware of any IPR issues required for full conformance with the 
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.


Thanks


Yu





------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "cuiyong"<cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>;
Date:  Wed, Feb 20, 2019 05:20 PM
To:  "draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius"<draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius@ietf.org>;
Cc:  "Softwires-wg"<softwires@ietf.org>; "Yong Cui"<cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>; "Ian Farrer"<ifarrer@me.com>; 
Subject:  Mail regarding draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius



Hi authors,

Before we submit this doc to IESG, we would like to ask the following 
two questions on this doc:

1) Are you aware any IPR issues required for full conformance with the 
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79?

2) Do you know any implementations?

Thanks,

Ian & Yong

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email