[Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefixes in the v4/v6 address mapping?
Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> Thu, 03 November 2011 09:24 UTC
Return-Path: <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B831F0C81 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 02:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1pt9dX9MlCSX for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 02:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp22.services.sfr.fr (smtp22.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0364D1F0C5C for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 02:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2203.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 62FB37000135; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:24:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (per92-10-88-166-221-144.fbx.proxad.net [88.166.221.144]) by msfrf2203.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EAB447000117; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:24:30 +0100 (CET)
X-SFR-UUID: 20111103092430961.EAB447000117@msfrf2203.sfr.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <A9FED2D1-80D0-445C-BA80-54A7E5DE8B03@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:24:30 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A4A4E371-FF5F-48F2-BFB3-C22D41D2C4C4@laposte.net>
References: <7017F405-CBEC-4D7D-94ED-56FF2B774C0C@laposte.net> <37EE7524-2AF1-4286-A80D-004E7958C5A0@gmail.com> <FCFFF724-847B-45D3-B6A5-1F937356F6B6@laposte.net> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A37B98DA7@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <BA1F9EBE-CDFE-47DB-BE40-08033E62AF17@cisco.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A37B98E17@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <88E22674-98FF-4F21-ADA4-4F3E77A6401D@laposte.net> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A37B98E3B@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <E296AD82-0AC6-460E-AB95-6AC6B8127008@cisco.com> <5225339E-1B72-456D-A0E7-2C96F2051EA3@juniper.net> <4EB214D3.7050900@jacni.com> <71723B71-64FD-4EE4-9E21-DE5D57E2FA60@laposte.net> <A9FED2D1-80D0-445C-BA80-54A7E5DE8B03@cisco.com>
To: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefixes in the v4/v6 address mapping?
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:24:32 -0000
Le 3 nov. 2011 à 10:04, Ole Troan a écrit : ... >> Requiring ISPs to maintain IPv4 routing in their networks, just to serve the few users that need to keep IPv4 prefixes, seems to me a step backward. > > can you clarify why this? I don't understand why IPv4 routing has to be maintained just because there is a MAP domain with full IPv4 addresses (or a rule for full IPv4 addresses)? I didn't say that. IF the address mapping can't assign IPv4 prefixes to CEs, AND IF an ISP has to support some users needing IPv4 prefixes, it needs a tool to do it. I supposed that maintaining IPv4 routing was the easiest way to do it. If you have a better alternative, what would it be? As said to Med, if I misunderstood Jacni's idea, this debate can be closed. Cheers, RD
- Re: [Softwires] Port mapping - Don't change it at… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] Port mapping - Don't change it at… Jacni Qin
- Re: [Softwires] Port mapping - Don't change it at… Ole Troan
- [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefixes i… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefix… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefix… Rémi Després
- [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefixes i… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefix… Jacni Qin
- Re: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefix… Jacni Qin