Re: [Softwires] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-06: (with COMMENT)

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Thu, 13 June 2019 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD7A120048; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PAue-p7UFDzO; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta136.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68EAD1201D2; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.71]) by opfednr25.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 45PX3M3t1DzCtSQ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:14:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.32]) by opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 45PX3M2vKHzFpXB; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:14:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM7C.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::2c53:f99a:e2a9:19c6%21]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:14:23 +0200
From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel@ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>, "softwire-chairs@ietf.org" <softwire-chairs@ietf.org>, "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVIVkcOYJKkU0wkEa4amGljC64pKaZCQOw
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 05:14:22 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EAA5F22@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <156036946625.14203.2936726178573745267.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156036946625.14203.2936726178573745267.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/IViy3_g48iQn3rbqOIeDk1lUYyc>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 05:14:28 -0000

Hi Ben, 

Please see inline. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : mercredi 12 juin 2019 21:58
> À : The IESG
> Cc : draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel@ietf.org; Yong Cui; softwire-
> chairs@ietf.org; cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn; softwires@ietf.org
> Objet : Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-06:
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-06: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I agree with Tom Petch that adding "tunnelType Registry" or "tunnelType
> Definitions" more prominently on the IANA website is advisable.

[Med] I agree but I didn't include any note into this I-D because this is the kind of clarification that is better covered in draft-thaler-iftype-reg (to be sponsored by Suresh).

> 
> On a more general note, it's pretty weird to me to go and create a

[Med] There is a disconnect here. This I-D is not creating a new registry, it is mirroring an existing one. 

> registry with a fairly long list of initial population but then claim
> that it is not intended to be complete and should be supplemented by
> additional registrations for existing protocols.  Either it should be
> complete, or we can just have a small sample of initial registrations to
> "get a feel" for what they look like and what needs to be included.
> Then, most registrations would be done as standalone registrations and
> it would not feel like the outliers were getting rejected.
> 
> Appendix A
> 
> The example module's namespace was not changed to reflect the move away
> from ietf-*.
> 

Med] Will be updated.