IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] 4rd Address Mapping - version-01

GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com> Mon, 26 September 2011 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <phdgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F86311E8094 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eqCIqj7jqr1B for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C8121F8DA3 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyh21 with SMTP id 21so4399898wyh.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g4tcxcLUjArPOABgneICdIfjyTdJE41r6tPjuuh5N7E=; b=fyNGwmvJVipQCse8a4033SIgZrKnfKB5XOsljvcrXD7eCRgum3ZBlaVjLlstllvv+t JxkIpgncGHSyOy0YRk4GSrlxGknb3ZbFQoZpUkACm5sBvHm71jHZBUkUvcuD2vE5dNi9 nkchHxW713FqMOVFCNquD7s1siyYRp6AflD8A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.165.202 with SMTP id j10mr7798721wby.18.1317054434384; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.84.161 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B3D5FABA-72BA-4C35-A068-D823CC0A4682@laposte.net>
References: <D8334AA7-5001-4A92-B977-CE32931F4197@laposte.net> <CAAuHL_Cm6WYiM2Cu-fmu=gBLgTYDZ6hr56BfcXMoeS=Af4Q_jw@mail.gmail.com> <B3D5FABA-72BA-4C35-A068-D823CC0A4682@laposte.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:27:14 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM+vMERSbGuraAC9snvGUgPBOY40m5p0SX46qfVqJaB6bHmvCw@mail.gmail.com>
From: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] 4rd Address Mapping - version-01
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:25:03 -0000

2011/9/22, Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>:
> hi Washam,
> Thank you for your remarks.
> Answers inline.
>
> Le 22 sept. 2011 à 16:06, Washam Fan a écrit :
>
>> Hi Remi,
>>
>> I found this version is more clearer and simpler thanks to those
>> examples and diagrams.
>>
>> I have 3 comments here:
>> 1. You mentioned port-less layer-4 protocol in section 6, were you
>> refering to ICMP? IIRC, the echo request sequence can be seen as a
>> port to some extend. But it was not mentioned in the new version,
>> Would you explain why?
>
> It is actually covered at the bottom of page 6 and beginning of page 7.
> OK?

I guess what Washam mentioned is why example in section 6 would not
demonstrate how to use such ID bits in ICMP message?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email