Re: [Softwires] MAP documents - next steps

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Mon, 30 January 2012 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6693921F8543 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XmHq0ixeRQT4 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DEC21F8540 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wicr5 with SMTP id r5so4287363wic.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-tagtoolbar-keys:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KTRiX1q3eWSHST59yUsGs1ryZ0u7OcrEKqXM8vrGfkQ=; b=v/cmTAX8um74t1ZpE/P0MLHuYEdomXJOfdOzpxP4w2dTobSjMuKZNLX3/f4f+ujwgK sBC/1xaJjYlyrEAoW4kJpCJ6rEEz0FE42tAqUkmvxj6sxW6Kccth0Iw1aLPB1Lt/iTV4 eURR9IOLtZz2Ct+1LaU7gMo1UotQjTx3yuwSw=
Received: by 10.180.77.200 with SMTP id u8mr29504545wiw.18.1327950953534; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bj10sm32270956wib.9.2012.01.30.11.15.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F26EC65.2010804@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:15:49 +0100
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: softwires@ietf.org
References: <5AAB067C-B5EF-4F75-B844-AFC33A96261C@employees.org> <7CBB29AF-0670-4471-B10C-C53FB63C5B5C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7CBB29AF-0670-4471-B10C-C53FB63C5B5C@cisco.com>
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20120130201549199
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP documents - next steps
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:15:55 -0000

On 30.01.2012 13:39, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
> Yes. I support WG adoption (and carry on the discussion further).
For what it is worth, I support WG adoption.

Cheers,
Tomek
MAP design team member, map-dhcp editor

> On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> 
>> hi,
>>
>> the MAP (Mapping of address and port) design team has now written and published the following sets of drafts.
>>
>> the base document (port mapping algorithm):
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-mapping-address-and-port-03
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mdt-softwire-mapping-address-and-port-03.txt
>>
>> the encapsulation document (MAP-E):
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-encapsulation-00
>>
>> the translation document (MAP-T):
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation-00
>>
>> the DHCP option (MAP-DHCP):
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-02
>>
>> there is a MAP deployment document coming soon.
>>
>> the solution described in this set of documents, are written to satisfy the following from the softwires charter:
>>   4. Developments for stateless legacy IPv4 carried over IPv6 
>>      - develop a solution motivation document to be published as an RFC 
>>      - develop a protocol specification response to the solution 
>>        motivation document; this work item will not be taken through 
>>
>> in the design team's view, this set of documents are ready to be adopted as working group documents.
>>
>> comments?
>>
>> for the MAP design team,
>> Ole
>> _______________________________________________
>> Softwires mailing list
>> Softwires@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires