Re: [Softwires] MAP documents - next steps

[Tomek Mrugalski <[e-mail]>]

On 30.01.2012 13:39, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
> Yes. I support WG adoption (and carry on the discussion further).
For what it is worth, I support WG adoption.

Cheers,
Tomek
MAP design team member, map-dhcp editor

> On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Ole Trøan <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> hi,
>>
>> the MAP (Mapping of address and port) design team has now written and published the following sets of drafts.
>>
>> the base document (port mapping algorithm):
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-mapping-address-and-port-03
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mdt-softwire-mapping-address-and-port-03.txt
>>
>> the encapsulation document (MAP-E):
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-encapsulation-00
>>
>> the translation document (MAP-T):
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation-00
>>
>> the DHCP option (MAP-DHCP):
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-02
>>
>> there is a MAP deployment document coming soon.
>>
>> the solution described in this set of documents, are written to satisfy the following from the softwires charter:
>>   4. Developments for stateless legacy IPv4 carried over IPv6 
>>      - develop a solution motivation document to be published as an RFC 
>>      - develop a protocol specification response to the solution 
>>        motivation document; this work item will not be taken through 
>>
>> in the design team's view, this set of documents are ready to be adopted as working group documents.
>>
>> comments?
>>
>> for the MAP design team,
>> Ole
>> _______________________________________________
>> Softwires mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires