IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] 4rd Address Mapping - version-01

Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com> Sat, 15 October 2011 02:35 UTC

Return-Path: <fibrib@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D33B21F8CE1 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SjCSSVBa4uac for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEB521F8CBF for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk33 with SMTP id 33so2616141qyk.10 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=m/6UYFcNKcNmMEYbFS7ZMW5R7TzOjzgLH9BrcYWy2FQ=; b=wX/uj+5Zv5WWWgaBkAPvsMOJLoWeaJr9RwnbdW2CDCc0yBTNbTcGbb63alQQmMybx0 WISAgJbPpwZ7roVaLQdr7prvnrl0945XpXxdkJELhxIRB0hScYTRAXKPQ5knd4qmfJjo lMLPaALj8brhz01dMp2SgAUVWDoOfAjoKM51Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.63.194 with SMTP id c2mr2389427qci.69.1318646133737; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.214.212 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFUBMqUvrP-s1yrJ0=ToAA_SvRLWQtq7JCTtpASNiS1GAxdSNQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D8334AA7-5001-4A92-B977-CE32931F4197@laposte.net> <CAAuHL_Cm6WYiM2Cu-fmu=gBLgTYDZ6hr56BfcXMoeS=Af4Q_jw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFUBMqUvrP-s1yrJ0=ToAA_SvRLWQtq7JCTtpASNiS1GAxdSNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:35:33 +0900
Message-ID: <CAFUBMqV9TiV5d0243ew+bCvFexy4nKoodopNi_7bKL4XtYxXOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com>
To: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>, Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e64fcd8a62cb1a04af4d3aa8"
Subject: Re: [Softwires] 4rd Address Mapping - version-01
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:35:40 -0000

errata:
2011/10/15 Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com>

>  Q2. then it must fine as long as we map them to different Rule IPv6
> Prefix. (?)
>
>     suppose CE1 is the same as (1). for 64.32../16, we use a longer stuff.
>     however, there is a CE3:
>
>   Rule IPv6 Prefix B: 20010db8       (2001:db8::/29)
>     CE3 IPv4 address:    4020 1876   (64.32.24.118)
>             CE3 PSID:             54
>         CE3 CE index:         987654
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> (3)  CE3 IPv6 prefix: 20010db 987654 (2001:db9:8765:4000::/52, woops!)
>
                                                             ^^53 if PSID
0x54 is 8bit.
but the generated CE3 IPv6 address is as same as CE1,
2001:db9:8765:4000:200:5efe::.


>     Rule_IPv4_Prefix Rule_IPv6_Prefix
>    -----------------------------------
>     192.32../12      2001:db0::/29
>     64.32../16       2001:db9::/29
>
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^2001:db8::/29

>
>
   -----------------------------------
>

thanks and regards,
maoke

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email