Re: [Softwires] Mailing list question to gauge consensus on 4rd-U vs MAP

2012/4/5, Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net>:
> Dear Softwire wg members:
>
> At the Paris IETF Softwire meeting, we had presentations on MAP (taken as a
> whole)  and
> 4rd-U. We got very strong feedback that we needed to select one
> solution to cover that full stateless case, not two, and that we should make
> this
> decision relatively quickly.
>
> During Paris meeting, we asked the following additional question:
> Do you prefer MAP or 4rd-U?
> We got about 1/3 support for 4rd-U and 2/3 for MAP.
>
> The real gauge of consensus is the mailing list, so we would like
> to ask the same questions to the list.
>
> =====================================================================
> Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a
> whole) on the standard track,
> the other being published as experimental or informational.
> Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as
> standard track.
> Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the
> standard track.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: YES or NO
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is there any ohter options? for example, why not put both on
experimental/informational and according to the real deployment then
changing one to standard track?

>
> =====================================================================
>
> Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track:
> 4rd-U or MAP?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: 4rd-U or MAP
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4RD-U, If we decide do not allow other options.
Dapeng Liu, China Mobile

> =====================================================================
>
>
>
>
> Please fill out the following form and reply to the list
> by Wednesday 4/10 5pm EDT.
>
> Note: Use this thread ONLY for expressing your support to
> one OR the other, and redirect any discussions to other threads.
> That would help up gauge consensus.
>
> Alain & Yong.
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>

-- 

------
Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu