Re: [Softwires] Stateless implementation plan

"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Wed, 08 February 2012 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D2921F85EF for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:37:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.219, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mk11C5s38iJA for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:37:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [76.96.32.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7934D21F85B4 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:37:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([24.40.55.42]) by copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id C7WM3M1.5547827; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:27:06 -0700
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::a5b0:e5c4:df1b:2367]) by PACDCEXHUB01.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::d1e7:20b5:9b63:21a6%11]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:36:45 -0500
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] Stateless implementation plan
Thread-Index: AQHM5pCbQi4to1RdukWr9pyZpPZWAw==
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:36:44 +0000
Message-ID: <CB582AE7.1C4E3%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <1E2A9D37-5787-46E2-A0D4-B2E116FA0A80@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
x-originating-ip: [24.40.55.70]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <89B26B077493CF4FBB2F6590D9196D6F@cable.comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Stateless implementation plan
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:37:02 -0000

+1

On 2/8/12 7:20 AM, "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com> wrote:

>IOW, if CE is able to get native IPv6 anyway for MAP, then anything
>non-native IPv6 would have no usage.