IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] Proposed Unified Address Mapping for encapsulation and double-translation

Jacni Qin <jacni@jacni.com> Mon, 10 October 2011 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jacni@jacni.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B20F21F8507 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.079, BAYES_20=-0.74, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fhk8inQNbQcM for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv05.olivemail.cn (mx100.vip.olivemail.net [74.82.185.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952A721F84FA for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv01.olivemail.cn (unknown [202.105.21.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by srv05.olivemail.cn (Olivemail) with ESMTPS id 24B17380068 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 03:46:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from oray.cn (unknown [202.105.21.248]) by srv01.olivemail.cn (Olivemail) with SMTP id 7776234014A for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:46:39 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [172.21.25.30] (unknown [221.11.61.66]) by app (Coremail) with SMTP id +AWowJBrmgPFopJOytcWAA--.30163S2; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:46:29 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <4E92A32C.30306@jacni.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:47:56 +0800
From: Jacni Qin <jacni@jacni.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
References: <F259BF79-B3C9-4434-AAC4-9F84B8D9A0FA@laposte.net> <CAH3bfACp_xvzotgrAhBrYhZ9ki47kbBVb-vmSsRtOOoyXxRSrA@mail.gmail.com> <10DF6CE6-394E-4FC9-BB80-9F24D4D2634B@laposte.net> <4E9065BD.3050001@jacni.com> <2904870A-866E-4093-8754-3D75510B82AA@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <2904870A-866E-4093-8754-3D75510B82AA@laposte.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030409080005080904000601"
X-CM-TRANSID: +AWowJBrmgPFopJOytcWAA--.30163S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjpYb7IF0VCYb41lb7IF0VCFI7km07C26c804VAK zcIF0wAYjsxI4VWDJwAYFVCjjxCrM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM2 vj6xkI62vS6c8GOVWUtr1rJFylYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JrI_JrylYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v2 6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JMx8GjcxK6IxK0xIIj40E5I8CrwCYjI0SjxkI62AI1cAE67 vIY487MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxCIbVAxMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jrv_JF1lIxkGc2Ij 64vIr4UvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8t3vUUUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: xmdf0xo6mdu03lof0z/1tbiAQAREko7lOfdJwAAs6
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Proposed Unified Address Mapping for encapsulation and double-translation
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:46:43 -0000

hi Remi,

On 10/10/2011 3:26 PM, Rémi Després wrote:
>
> ...
>
>
> The 4rd function examines ALL packets that reach the CE.
> It processes all those that have V in their destination addresses, and 
> only those.
>
This is a big change to the current forwarding behavior of CPE devices, 
doable, but quite different from, for example, some 
encapsulation/decapsulation implementations.


Cheers,
Jacni

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email