IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Thu, 16 February 2012 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A4A21F877B for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:07:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYD+PjpRQF47 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:07:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB8621F8773 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LZH00JWNOJK3X@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for softwires@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:06:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LZH00GYKOIVM2@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for softwires@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:06:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml213-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGW86804; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:06:55 +0800
Received: from SZXEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.160) by szxeml213-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:06:45 +0800
Received: from SZXEML526-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.64]) by szxeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.160]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:07:19 +0800
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:06:46 +0000
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <CAFUBMqUGQB-+rTOuLyKdTmXHxdoqAN7NfuxC4ZGS_VhUKsxKUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com>
Message-id: <1DD7B5A7-BFBA-43CA-A55A-8E77D39E1FE6@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_CCNKfyoDVA8RuOonm2PrYw)"
Content-language: en-US
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6
Thread-index: AQHM67TbW0deHUyxL0GeDRlK7kAql5Y92foAgAB0AICAABKNgIAABqeAgAEp10Y=
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <CAFUBMqU6DwZr6SJsKDGWy+hTXks_XEt9WFBGfr9DzmaMHYQFAA@mail.gmail.com> <CB61E7C0.1CA20%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com> <CAFUBMqUGQB-+rTOuLyKdTmXHxdoqAN7NfuxC4ZGS_VhUKsxKUA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:07:03 -0000


Sent from my iPad

On Feb 16, 2012, at 5:21 AM, "Maoke" <fibrib@gmail.com<mailto:fibrib@gmail.com>> wrote:


2012/2/16 Lee, Yiu <Yiu_Lee@cable.comcast.com<mailto:Yiu_Lee@cable.comcast.com>>
Hi Maoke,

There are always trade-offs. We can suggest few options and ask the WG to choose one.

good point. acceptable. :) - maoke


1) Let the host to reassemble the fragmented packets
2) Let the 4o6 TC to assemble the fragmented packets
2) may be easier.
3) Don’t suggest anything and leave this open for implementation

/Yiu


From: Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com<mailto:fibrib@gmail.com>>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:50:33 +0900
To: "Yiu L. LEE" <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com<mailto:yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>>
Cc: Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com<mailto:bingxuere@gmail.com>>, "softwires@ietf.org<mailto:softwires@ietf.org>" <softwires@ietf.org<mailto:softwires@ietf.org>>

Subject: Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6

the "since we believe" is true in the term that client/server model is dominating the Internet usage. but the situation is changing, AFTR might suffer a heavy burden with reassembly in the environment where p2p is dominating. can we (actually you authors) surely state lightweight 4over6 improves this? if we can, it is a happy point. ;-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email