Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-08.txt

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 15 August 2013 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4072E21F99A1 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7rZURazy2lDU for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1BE21F99AD for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id CC77FA1; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:10:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EA99C; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:10:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:10:21 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFUBMqVPM+Q_-iFjs_a=Do6CcXMHAL=e=WiQ5gs8VAAb6cCVWA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308150908380.5289@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20130812121654.30206.92319.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EEC7E980D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <86841AD5-1864-4177-BEE1-4181DDE085EF@employees.org> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EEC7E9915@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <8FF0368A-D069-4BDA-9919-58FE22B81026@employees.org> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EEC7E9976@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <7A1D5E0A-55FE-4CF6-9444-A1BE212BB451@employees.org> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EEC7E9992@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <647A4750-13B0-48FC-8F1B-6851248DB941@employees.org> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EEC7E99B8@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAFUBMqVPM+Q_-iFjs_a=Do6CcXMHAL=e=WiQ5gs8VAAb6cCVWA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-08.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:10:24 -0000

On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Maoke wrote:

> my technical understanding on this issue:
>
> 1. (the reason of using unified CPE) unified CPE is a sort of CPE that is
> used by an ISP that wants to
>    A. simultaneously deploy MAP and lw4o6 and 4rd (and/or something else,
> out-of-scope or not?) there and here respectively but doesn't want to
> distinguish the device distribution among those subscribers;
>    B. potentially deploy MAP or lw4o6 according to backbone strategy but
> currently hasn't be sure there will be no change in the future and
> therefore doesn't like to leave limitations at the subscribers' side.
>    C. deploy either MAP or lw4o6 but doesn't care what to distribute to
> the subscribers as long as compatibility is ensured.

D. Customer buys a retail box that should be plug and play in any 
provider network regardless of what mechanism the provider supports.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se