Re: [Softwires] 4rd Address Mapping - version-01

[Rémi Després <[e-mail]>]

Hi Xing, Congxiao,

Le 4 oct. 2011 à 15:26, xiaohong deng a écrit :
...
> It IMHO would be helpful if anybody would clarify some details to 1)
> first prove source based classification is either a valid or a
> non-valid requirement for address mapping; For this regard, I would
> begin with that why do we think the source based IPv4 classification
> ability instead of the more general five-tuple based IPv4
> classification ability should be reserved, when deliver IPv4 over
> IPv6?

What about starting from your conclusion slide in Beijing?

It says:

"dIVI/dIVI-PD can use existing tools for O&M
– Null route
– ACL
– eACL
– PBR
– QoS
– Caching"

Open questions include:
- Which addresses are used for these O&M functions? (source? destination?, CE to CE?, CE to BR?, BR to CE?)
- Are ports within IPv6 payloads used, or just addresses?

Thank you if you can share your views on this.

Regards,
RD