[Softwires] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5969 (3049)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 11 December 2011 15:14 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC98321F853A for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:14:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.445
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.445 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZvVXkVsoTbf for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:14:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243C621F852E for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:14:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5234D72E004; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:13:33 -0800 (PST)
To: mark@townsley.net, ot@cisco.com, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, adurand@juniper.net, cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20111211151333.5234D72E004@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:13:33 -0800
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, alessandro.cortiana@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Softwires] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5969 (3049)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:14:22 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5969, "IPv6 Rapid Deployment on IPv4 Infrastructures (6rd) -- Protocol Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5969&eid=3049 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Alessandro Cortiana <alessandro.cortiana@gmail.com> Section: 12 Original Text ------------- By restricting the 6rd domain to within a provider network, a CE only needs to accept packets from a single or small set of known 6rd BR IPv4 addresses. Corrected Text -------------- By restricting the 6rd domain to within a provider network, a CE only needs to accept packets from a single or small set of known 6rd BR IPv4 addresses and from other CEs within the 6rd domain. Notes ----- A CE also needs to accept packets from other CEs within the 6rd domain. This happens when, within a 6rd domain, two customer sites want to communicate. Reference: RFC5569 section 3 Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5969 (draft-ietf-softwire-ipv6-6rd-10) -------------------------------------- Title : IPv6 Rapid Deployment on IPv4 Infrastructures (6rd) -- Protocol Specification Publication Date : August 2010 Author(s) : W. Townsley, O. Troan Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Softwires Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Softwires] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5969 (… RFC Errata System
- Re: [Softwires] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC59… Hemant Singh (shemant)