Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E/T?
Ida Leung <ida@brumund.ca> Tue, 30 September 2014 16:23 UTC
Return-Path: <ida@brumund.ca>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09761A1ACA for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QSRe_PUKQs0B for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BF431A1ACF for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id gm9so2868294lab.13 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PZU+BGpE3wQUeNJXT024b5SbKMsYUCWjRA4lmc8PtAE=; b=T06e2GXEhm/a+ipjE5RilO9mFDMWUrgZFXyJ0YeqDQAFpeTFsBQi0URQEYlU5XQ0e9 mToQw49UkBLIVjjcDAsNGbE5DCeTPTFMxpl+tOXROqhSb+O+gg/q/TbtEn/aaxVBYONE Vl2eqQhZrAVF3P3osFVGDgEtr6JnY3nJMNAm0z+bvEoHKtZJWPUt08UWZANKL/cq4GcB n3uAzDRKbBAuL6244IJHH/RlwIX9P4IyOdLgXo1toJ8J1TEhqkCO2pYOpF2/qz5Bw7ZD w3FM8RyY6Bqk8koGlf32qKecnpgdt/ViecxBGnUTUKUBGrBIiyEECywu0trTBsR6oD/I KF9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLwTc6HlNkbtVA5lKcE3eHeqjrb9nZlIgRbTc/GazZQzk5p398RBRZGWAoAV4to2g1zQv8
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.8.9 with SMTP id n9mr49014521laa.2.1412094194442; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.9.100 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [99.242.86.41]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:23:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CALFC0Y02fKOWf-WXpvZwFbzt5vOxgMEQ7QE50=LvgCBQPXr5rQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ida Leung <ida@brumund.ca>
To: akaliwod@cisco.com, softwires@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c36748d9782905044accab"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/dPg3PWLEy2zQgkGreGzthOehN1s
Subject: Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E/T?
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:23:28 -0000
Kali, Wonder how you extend the home LAN to VM? does it involve any software installation in existing CPE? Also, does the solution works well with any off the shelf CPE customer owned? Virtual CPE solution was in my mind but after the quote from the Vendor solution, i have to make more use cases to justify it. Just MAP-T is not enough. ...Ida
- Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E… Ida Leung
- Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E… Poscic, Kristian (Kristian)
- Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E… Arkadiusz Kaliwoda (akaliwod)
- Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E… Armstrong, Bill R
- Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E… Ida Leung