IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-13.txt

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Fri, 14 November 2014 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302E41A8909 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:29:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Dc7mG4PXSeh for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:29:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [198.137.202.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ECC71A1B21 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:29:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FED6346; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:28:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s= selector1; bh=R26GkeRuksmrOOsAS6D7IZIejuE=; b=EZpNXJrqew4A8tR3lK 6XAPuR+Bi+uhRQGbtaH6CU+L4Lapib8a5JbJMIylkg4DxBCj1rA86ci8KGC6V7Yd A7jZuqfBFNO6j5u/+cHwFoBX/FEMTfWyhyHznflMzzLlb+DEw0B7wZPztgR7tlaf TfVtdbE6UYUeRLyfzY8HWfBZ8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= selector1; b=NOR/E6Spa0CbN4OehEJaSoIkMUkXTZ5oLCAmhmBGdnuYRdY0bef 8nGe/pi2QX8RCC4f0s2ScE2zHhnKHmkYxV3liKwwOVHiPn0R5rNnD3AvYycEAupB HtgQC6vKn10SrgIIznswrPSylJlHQeRsbQ0iNa67lDIKXH9ZiwDzmJV0=
Received: from gomlefisk.localdomain (dhcp-a16d.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.161.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FF2F632D; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:28:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gomlefisk.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC09F3915272; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:28:58 -1000 (HST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <3DFF6D3B-A89E-432E-8BD0-6F68F7403513@nominum.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:28:58 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0CB8ACE5-442E-4C2C-8919-B3A58B43BC24@employees.org>
References: <20141114033346.15574.20517.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B76318B371EBE7B@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <3DFF6D3B-A89E-432E-8BD0-6F68F7403513@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/dYMaU5BZAKMe2vLGTh35wSGoozI
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-13.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:29:01 -0000

Ted,

>> A small update to include text describing possible fragment ID problems, in line with the MAP-E draft as discussed in the Softwire meeting on Tuesday.
> 
> I thought we walked away from that discussion having concluded that the likelihood of a collision of this type is vanishingly small, and that it would be corrected by retransmission.   Ole, what did you take away from the meeting as an action item, if anything?   Did we decide to leave the text in anyway?

yes, I also walked away with "this is a corner case of a corner case", but I also assumed that we should continue to describe the problem. without providing any normative solution.

are you fine with keeping it in? you could of course that we don't help anyone very much by hand waving about it... without providing a solution.

cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email