Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-13.txt

Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko <ayourtch@gmail.com> Fri, 21 November 2014 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ayourtch@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF111A1A1C for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:12:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O8o6hWFebcL9 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:12:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B07A01A1A16 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:12:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id h15so4826305igd.1 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:12:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MGZgSTqXXT5xYTtN5CybCVQeTC8jMXJSAIwmQu+eoVM=; b=YfJA7+Cl1QeDT3vZa0OgkjjPfWpm33OmN9TxhcEJwshpIzYGoK28OrjaRT9ngay+Ld YdiA+aY1QpZcNFE6GXNgnz/HxW/PA2Os4kWTpSoVbryZxOfGuMM7Ajg+bs0fYrgeEXd6 4c1cxk7UvmND96NP10WIsVScuOpDVay4GMW0v0jsRlQMTzDh1+XvsKNQcSMgItOxQ2hg F/ezVVJ4RP2VeZyIxjT4UPeu7LH/PQ6OHWUHzyLKe4Qp9N3N6SpJre3St2fOQqcQ9mjh PBdVrhnEU8efDZFfcpuO+7Up5hwPojorwT7mUCoG46ycID3Efymgay+/Fzv1x8eEBaCV NYXA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.43.129.196 with SMTP id hj4mr9497730icc.21.1416582770666; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.107.131.141 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:12:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0CB8ACE5-442E-4C2C-8919-B3A58B43BC24@employees.org>
References: <20141114033346.15574.20517.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B76318B371EBE7B@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <3DFF6D3B-A89E-432E-8BD0-6F68F7403513@nominum.com> <0CB8ACE5-442E-4C2C-8919-B3A58B43BC24@employees.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:12:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPi140O1Jcvmw9F0bWzBech9J1p0xp_mkjBPEXgq0-CK+mA5hA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko <ayourtch@gmail.com>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/es6cvJSxkl5Ibc5Llt0F1b8KQPs
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-13.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:12:54 -0000

On 11/14/14, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> Ted,
>
>>> A small update to include text describing possible fragment ID problems,
>>> in line with the MAP-E draft as discussed in the Softwire meeting on
>>> Tuesday.
>>
>> I thought we walked away from that discussion having concluded that the
>> likelihood of a collision of this type is vanishingly small, and that it
>> would be corrected by retransmission.   Ole, what did you take away from
>> the meeting as an action item, if anything?   Did we decide to leave the
>> text in anyway?
>
> yes, I also walked away with "this is a corner case of a corner case", but I
> also assumed that we should continue to describe the problem. without
> providing any normative solution.

FWIW - this was my understanding as well.

--a

>
> are you fine with keeping it in? you could of course that we don't help
> anyone very much by hand waving about it... without providing a solution.
>
> cheers,
> Ole
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>