Re: [Softwires] France Telecom's IPR Statement about 4rd

Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> Wed, 10 April 2013 10:14 UTC

Return-Path: <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CD521F9382 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4H-NiKahloTJ for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp23.services.sfr.fr (smtp23.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D104821F937E for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2312.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6AD91700016C; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:14:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (unknown [78.193.136.169]) by msfrf2312.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1E4917000159; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:14:55 +0200 (CEST)
X-SFR-UUID: 20130410101455124.1E4917000159@msfrf2312.sfr.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <5165361C.3040600@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:14:54 +0200
Message-Id: <23A3721E-11A3-4747-9BE0-2964F1954BCB@laposte.net>
References: <20130405175307.17053.57704.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <86BE1CED-B837-4BC5-B7DD-CEFF338845BC@laposte.net> <5164F579.4060404@ericsson.com> <1B297169-99E4-4763-A653-4C2E44F9EDE5@laposte.net> <5165361C.3040600@viagenie.ca>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] France Telecom's IPR Statement about 4rd
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:14:57 -0000

Le 2013-04-10 à 11:51, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> a écrit :

> Le 2013-04-10 09:23, Rémi Després a écrit :
>> In my understanding, this justifies that an IPR statement that doesn't concern an RFC (with due understanding of initiators of the statement), should be deleted by its initiators, in good faith, rather than inappropriately listed in the RFC itself.
> 
> Just keep in mind that the entity you're trying to convince is France Telecom, not this working group. If France Telecom doesn't find your arguments convincing, there's nothing we can do.

Well understood.

That's why my analysis is directly addressed to Med, the "Contact Information for the IETF Participant Whose Personal Belief Triggered this Disclosure".

I have confidence in his good faith, well known in the WG, to correct this mistake (or to explain in what my analysis would be wrong).

Cheers,
RD



> 
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires