Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-00.txt

wang.cui1@zte.com.cn Fri, 15 August 2014 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <wang.cui1@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E979B1A6F2A for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 00:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.817
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.817 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXjMrPpsi23L for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 00:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907581A6F2C for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 00:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse02.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.21]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 8F106128D371; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 15:46:32 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id s7F7kTxk095110; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 15:46:29 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wang.cui1@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <D0122944.D63C8%ian.farrer@telekom.de>
References: <20140701112428.5519.69335.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3FA94CC3-983B-4494-B27D-E1FD6EB7CE31@gmail.com> <OFB0F0C9C5.100FC816-ON48257D2B.00266CAC-48257D2B.0027051C@zte.com.cn> <B6946555-69C0-4BA6-A5E0-55382CB146AF@gmail.com> <OFFB351444.4A3199FD-ON48257D34.0022D979-48257D34.00254FB0@zte.com.cn> <D0122944.D63C8%ian.farrer@telekom.de>
To: ian.farrer@telekom.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 6DE90213:5F629105-48257D35:0028DCDD; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3 September 15, 2011
Message-ID: <OF6DE90213.5F629105-ON48257D35.0028DCDD-48257D35.002AB69C@zte.com.cn>
From: wang.cui1@zte.com.cn
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 15:46:14 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2014-08-15 15:46:23, Serialize complete at 2014-08-15 15:46:23
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 002AB69748257D35_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn s7F7kTxk095110
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/i9GQ1MYa-Z7PP0EC8vxalvLfmKk
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-00.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:47:00 -0000

Hi Ian,

  Thanks for your explaination. Now I get the main purpose and I really 
guess it would be better 
understood if you can put your words below in the new version of this 
draft :)

  And now I guess this draft may be the companion draft of a new draft 
about how to synchronise 
the binding table in the border router. Am I right?

  What's more, here are some editorial errors as follow, it would be 
better if they can be revised.
  Section 5.1:  cipv6-hintlen or cipv6-boundlen ? cipv6-prefix-hint or 
cipv6-bound-prefix?
 
  Nothing else.

  Thanks a lot.

BRs,
Linda Wang


<ian.farrer@telekom.de> 写于 2014-08-14 16:00:18:

> <ian.farrer@telekom.de> 
> 2014-08-14 16:00
> 
> 收件人
> 
> <wang.cui1@zte.com.cn>, <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>, 
> 
> 抄送
> 
> <softwires@ietf.org>
> 
> 主题
> 
> Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draft-fsc-softwire-
> dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-00.txt
> 
> Hi Linda,
> 
> Please see below.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
> Qi, 
> 
>   That's exactly what I want to express. Now it's addressed. Thanks.
> 
>   Here, I have another question: some content in section 1:
> 
>    The service provider can then
>   use this binding information to provision other functional elements
>   in their network accordingly (such as the border router). 
> 
> What would be provisioned by using this binding information?
> 
> And also, I am not very sure that I have gotten the true purpose of 
> this solution. If you can elaborate more details, it would be much 
> more better.
> 
> [ian] For lw4o6 (and other A+P based softwire mechanisms), the 
> provisioning system for client softwire configuration and the 
> softwire border router (lwAFTR) have to be completely aligned so 
> that traffic can be correctly routed.
> 
> If you have dynamic IP address leasing, as is possible with 
> DHCPv4o6, then the border router has to be updated with the current 
> client address leases and also the IPv6 addresses that are being 
> used as tunnel endpoints.
> 
> As the DHCPv4o6 server is managing the address leasing, this draft 
> provides a way that it can also store the IPv6 address that it’s 
> clients will use for building their softwire tunnels meaning that 
> there is a single point in the network storing this information. 
> This information will then be used to synchronise the binding table 
> in the border router, although how this is done isn’t in the scope 
> of this draft.
> 
> 
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-softwire-lw4over6-dhcp-deployment

> / describes the overall architecture in more details.