[Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefixes in the v4/v6 address mapping?
Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> Thu, 03 November 2011 09:04 UTC
Return-Path: <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A57811E8088 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 02:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.037
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.088, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QYYNnbinp7eN for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 02:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp22.services.sfr.fr (smtp22.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B7B11E80ED for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 02:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2203.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BACDE7000124; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:04:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (per92-10-88-166-221-144.fbx.proxad.net [88.166.221.144]) by msfrf2203.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2421070000D3; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:04:33 +0100 (CET)
X-SFR-UUID: 20111103090434148.2421070000D3@msfrf2203.sfr.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <4EB255CC.30602@jacni.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:04:32 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CDFCECE5-A6F3-4C21-81D6-272C9F360E92@laposte.net>
References: <7017F405-CBEC-4D7D-94ED-56FF2B774C0C@laposte.net> <37EE7524-2AF1-4286-A80D-004E7958C5A0@gmail.com> <FCFFF724-847B-45D3-B6A5-1F937356F6B6@laposte.net> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A37B98DA7@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <BA1F9EBE-CDFE-47DB-BE40-08033E62AF17@cisco.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A37B98E17@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <88E22674-98FF-4F21-ADA4-4F3E77A6401D@laposte.net> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A37B98E3B@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <E296AD82-0AC6-460E-AB95-6AC6B8127008@cisco.com> <5225339E-1B72-456D-A0E7-2C96F2051EA3@juniper.net> <4EB214D3.7050900@jacni.com> <71723B71-64FD-4EE4-9E21-DE5D57E2FA60@laposte.net> <4EB255CC.30602@jacni.com>
To: Jacni Qin <jacni@jacni.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com>, Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefixes in the v4/v6 address mapping?
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:04:40 -0000
Le 3 nov. 2011 à 09:50, Jacni Qin a écrit : >>> if the MAP just covers "shared address with one single sharing ratio for one domain", >>> the design will be greatly simplified? >> Requiring ISPs to maintain IPv4 routing in their networks, just to serve the few users that need to keep IPv4 prefixes, seems to me a step backward. >> >> Besides, I have serious doubts about "greatly simplified". > I mean for the design of the address/port mapping algorithm, not the transport mechanism. Yes, but I don't see the great simplification of the algorithm. Keeping it general enough to support IPv4 prefixes is AFAIK easy. It doesn't prevent deployments where, IPv4 prefixes being not supported, fields can be at places that may be found more convenient. Maybe you can be more specific on your concern. Cheers, RD
- Re: [Softwires] Port mapping - Don't change it at… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] Port mapping - Don't change it at… Jacni Qin
- Re: [Softwires] Port mapping - Don't change it at… Ole Troan
- [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefixes i… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefix… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefix… Rémi Després
- [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefixes i… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefix… Jacni Qin
- Re: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefix… Jacni Qin