IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Softwires] lw4o6 question

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Wed, 24 September 2014 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653DB1A07BE for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t2tydr3gr5bD for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 778631A017C for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b12so11231146lbj.25 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LxQcEIhcFnnm4/TXS6OhSUk8sDE6d5fztmj3XwhiDK0=; b=sqYDjb6CBHd5BSnXsTCC/BmyWpXiTVjKlyeX2VRLBqXAFekbM8fQgf2dT1toLHkes+ m+X/KZo/l2AtSwh3DM3bLtGn/YeUTsGpxD9krZ30WJumFvrvLxA91L0bAkuU+Lgk9TRk W3uUgPpAH+ZmGpTa5DMjdmSu6/lRW1zmKrjq3WhgBelLLO4cna5onF7Kz08TjBsXlbCH lkyRI7Ri1qMI941vC/N9Q5rks3max9wOVyYBdlXAkoG+9Zv9gaq55R9bWfIQfXcSMXNy uyKnx00qZ+o9GnKDJ9f8afSPSKj/aqlopgRjdLowWskKuRecuYcDLXph1mcGUl/6HTU6 dbmw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.21.6 with SMTP id r6mr8970324lae.6.1411591603531; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.77.37 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:46:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcdtsmG=cYqpTt-spTrvCLFWLFi7EYRzgRt7MjNZaTNfMw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/kdokfvZ_EyRAFcG5psqZHl0EDeE
Subject: [Softwires] lw4o6 question
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:46:49 -0000

 Hi all,

I noticed that RFC 4213 is referenced in both Section 5.2 and 6.2 regarding:
 Covering tunneling and traffic  class mapping between IPv4 and IPv6

I am curious as to why RFC 4213 which only deals with tunneling IPv6
packets in IPv4 would be relevant to lw4o6?

Regards,

Behcet

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status