[Softwires] Results on WG Consensus question for IPR Disclosure on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast
Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 14:24 UTC
Return-Path: <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D76129A10 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 07:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cf7NM_DoU7Aj for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 07:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E4D01296D4 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 07:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ians-mbp.lan ([80.159.248.112]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6ioC-1cptJw0kTM-00wSsW for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 15:24:12 +0100
From: Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <87C9785E-FE86-4D03-BCDF-514C7CF43E2D@gmx.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 15:24:12 +0100
To: softwires <softwires@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:SrfP8XZ2Qj3Xx3hA1m1RalTncQGodN+i/tLcsgux/s5mJqUDbTa cUBg8NdV+sv5eJEKaViEh1Kh0j8lw82axMY2V64WtFrTs4O3HMNZ8jWTxOxq076iN/qvrru PmSPEIvAfUt2/SwbkoWySNKzuR7Zs8OVjDDlYis+COxMOwc2WN1xYwgdbrqWm0vhTkdIbGI Ht7d2PlMCPKx5OTk2UZAw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:aLw0n66bXW8=:ryB+0RaZMVohIgQe+QAYnl T4zKEB/z9DsisuMFcPstPmgDTzs9MRzFfjVUcgeABId8P1JohN/QvUwstamydSA3YonyQxaal 73sUha0gn7JXBPhQSrmrS7xURGSP7ElD20pJMkLzQlVaINyDyuN/QD4o9Cy4B08nkR+Hcj/WT IT8m6WFaHnpTqCx3I2xi8p13C8IvU3VXcEdg9ElUS9SNTTke+dFSEmmnngcCV+yCn93Wdc1L0 Z+TS6JN+1E103goTX6FUSCN+uBPrNP/u+pFVcZkcrLox5qfk7rUF6xFf+2w9F5vxouFWL+d4O wyc1wT7SFNDPSwNj+Soq1VCyQrQe6hgvNlNK0FpzjOB8qtnfZuE9GkgwAls/4xBDzETFDAyQ8 i4UHULG2VJkM6ur+4hqTRzrmd/6iCayiOuxVjZ1MQHmNsqbAUzZgdZadOgDbhW8pMUwyA4PDo NcCiwdoS6fE6Tym7+/tKUYmW476GRFWuyKx4Rv64vd0TXb04r7wxwVM49VHQOxWa8lCqr+KTi rPUlo0qykA7rb2l+G0w2fL1xe6Kf4ZtjKyTu5bkvknTgYSDiH2aF2SdkwX0nPcOJguMNb36Zo 5FX1Ll09yPOfojcpHweY/Ok6vOTofyUYWDuHo19fYXtzezINekgtroTq+B70bqbmHlPWC8BaD W+V9uZJmUx8uM28SzdfgnQAOrE3Nu7dnApaU025/60IthUGEzXhePaqaZdtKoWKK7E/Dh/otG vWJEsjncg/x1tdZofU1VdLOYnRIpJlong0RqYRfzfEQhiy7e/1v7g7muI8Ph2hrI6jZd5RpuR 8q8lZpH
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/lU3u-qJ1gAnBsx3eGPC5Ig92d1g>
Subject: [Softwires] Results on WG Consensus question for IPR Disclosure on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:24:18 -0000
Hi, A few weeks back I asked the WG their opinion on how to proceed with raft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast in light of the IPR disclosure. From the responses received, there is WG consensus to proceed with advancing the draft. Thanks, Yong & Ian