Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-00.txt
Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com> Mon, 18 August 2014 02:47 UTC
Return-Path: <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96D41A01E7 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q3bicSXjhege for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x231.google.com (mail-pd0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3071A01E6 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id p10so6619974pdj.36 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=jpOu2MM3CfRMIA4L9D17IUF4tcE9IxGKjglWf7F7LeA=; b=ZZiwG1w5J8YJY+1nY35vu6MC4jc91tXOjD3l0IMGcBqLUS6f7x10f3WVJ7EfPB7Y28 QGIVCFnlMEmIVk8mvaCr3jqcnc3Mlq6RbNXMInDzxm/Og5vs47XK5sPPYG6Nby+dEcLV BkWs/N5qHqbwL6l1MqW2tDw/UdN2sB0TibWjlGqJG2tUvjlFO03dByEwP3U4ZSQJTVhT zrHU8csF1rMEj+lVTCwzWJbTubOGenwpmNMUvISxWQ8qTbG88hUf5vSw+3LycgrQ8AnQ gq9TKBGgFwTyX1rYKJi4mS19KJhBZ+Pw0V5XK7yH1M49rlVWux8HnEJ+7ENa5HwtoOQs Z7Sw==
X-Received: by 10.68.162.3 with SMTP id xw3mr31062528pbb.142.1408330042444; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.103] ([166.111.68.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i2sm1992873pdl.86.2014.08.17.19.47.20 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_502EF66E-43CA-49C5-99A1-6A337F8D9E4D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF6DE90213.5F629105-ON48257D35.0028DCDD-48257D35.002AB69C@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:47:10 +0800
Message-Id: <ADDD1251-36BF-4161-87EE-F3C00CF6FD80@gmail.com>
References: <20140701112428.5519.69335.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3FA94CC3-983B-4494-B27D-E1FD6EB7CE31@gmail.com> <OFB0F0C9C5.100FC816-ON48257D2B.00266CAC-48257D2B.0027051C@zte.com.cn> <B6946555-69C0-4BA6-A5E0-55382CB146AF@gmail.com> <OFFB351444.4A3199FD-ON48257D34.0022D979-48257D34.00254FB0@zte.com.cn> <D0122944.D63C8%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <OF6DE90213.5F629105-ON48257D35.0028DCDD-48257D35.002AB69C@zte.com.cn>
To: wang.cui1@zte.com.cn
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/mPMKP_X5Up_ykmA-BnyHn_rBtsc
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-00.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 02:47:25 -0000
Hi Linda, Please see inline. Thanks, Qi On Aug 15, 2014, at 3:46 PM, wang.cui1@zte.com.cn wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Thanks for your explaination. Now I get the main purpose and I really guess it would be better > understood if you can put your words below in the new version of this draft :) [Qi] We will do some rewording to make it clearer. > > And now I guess this draft may be the companion draft of a new draft about how to synchronise > the binding table in the border router. Am I right? [Qi] This draft is scoped for communicating the bound v6 address to the DHCP 4o6 Server. The synchronisation process is handled in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-softwire-lw4over6-dhcp-deployment-04#section-4.5 . > > What's more, here are some editorial errors as follow, it would be better if they can be revised. > Section 5.1: cipv6-hintlen or cipv6-boundlen ? cipv6-prefix-hint or cipv6-bound-prefix? [Qi] Thanks for pointing it out. Should be: cipv6-hintlen/cipv6-prefix-hint. Thanks for comments~ > > Nothing else. > > Thanks a lot. > > BRs, > Linda Wang > > > <ian.farrer@telekom.de> 写于 2014-08-14 16:00:18: > > > <ian.farrer@telekom.de> > > 2014-08-14 16:00 > > > > 收件人 > > > > <wang.cui1@zte.com.cn>, <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>, > > > > 抄送 > > > > <softwires@ietf.org> > > > > 主题 > > > > Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draft-fsc-softwire- > > dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-00.txt > > > > Hi Linda, > > > > Please see below. > > > > Thanks, > > Ian > > > > Qi, > > > > That's exactly what I want to express. Now it's addressed. Thanks. > > > > Here, I have another question: some content in section 1: > > > > The service provider can then > > use this binding information to provision other functional elements > > in their network accordingly (such as the border router). > > > > What would be provisioned by using this binding information? > > > > And also, I am not very sure that I have gotten the true purpose of > > this solution. If you can elaborate more details, it would be much > > more better. > > > > [ian] For lw4o6 (and other A+P based softwire mechanisms), the > > provisioning system for client softwire configuration and the > > softwire border router (lwAFTR) have to be completely aligned so > > that traffic can be correctly routed. > > > > If you have dynamic IP address leasing, as is possible with > > DHCPv4o6, then the border router has to be updated with the current > > client address leases and also the IPv6 addresses that are being > > used as tunnel endpoints. > > > > As the DHCPv4o6 server is managing the address leasing, this draft > > provides a way that it can also store the IPv6 address that it’s > > clients will use for building their softwire tunnels meaning that > > there is a single point in the network storing this information. > > This information will then be used to synchronise the binding table > > in the border router, although how this is done isn’t in the scope > > of this draft. > > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-softwire-lw4over6-dhcp-deployment > > / describes the overall architecture in more details.
- [Softwires] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Qi Sun
- Re: [Softwires] Fwd: New Version Notification for… Tom Taylor
- Re: [Softwires] Fwd: New Version Notification for… Qi Sun
- Re: [Softwires] Fwd: New Version Notification for… ian.farrer
- Re: [Softwires] Fwd: New Version Notification for… Tom Taylor
- Re: [Softwires] Fwd: New Version Notification for… Tom Taylor
- Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draf… Ted Lemon
- [Softwires] 答复: Fwd: New Version Notification for… wang.cui1
- Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draf… Qi Sun
- Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draf… wang.cui1
- Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draf… ian.farrer
- Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draf… wang.cui1
- Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draf… Qi Sun
- Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draf… wang.cui1