Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite (part 1)
Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net> Tue, 10 August 2010 21:00 UTC
Return-Path: <adurand@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE673A6ADB for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFU-PiOQkF0k for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og102.obsmtp.com (exprod7og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.157]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9DD3A6A75 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob102.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTGG+IvRrOUgHzUiwdZnY7oCWs+ZrnlUP@postini.com; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:01:26 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::88f9:77fd:dfc:4d51%11]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:58:17 -0700
From: Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net>
To: Jari Arkko <Jari.Arkko@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:58:15 -0700
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite (part 1)
Thread-Index: Acs4zsFVi+RYmbJxSpiB2wRr5xU0Kw==
Message-ID: <D2AA1993-E95D-44B6-8FFB-DB41038E77FD@juniper.net>
References: <4C602025.3010504@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C602025.3010504@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite@tools.ietf.org>, "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite (part 1)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:00:52 -0000
On Aug 9, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: A DS-Lite home gateway SHOULD NOT operate a NAT function on a B4 interface, as the NAT function will be performed by the AFTR in the service provider's network. I am not sure what it means to operate a NAT function on an interface. Presumably it would be operated between two interfaces. Perhaps you wanted to say that "the GW SHOULD NOT operate a NAT function". If you look at natd in a traditional unix/linux kernel, the NAT deamon is associated to an outgoing interface. The semantic is, whatever packet leaving through that interface (according to the routing table) will be translated according to the specified NAT rules. In general, it means, the SRC address will be rewritten to the IP address configured on that interface. I initially wanted to say the home gateway SHOULD NOT operate NAT, but then we thought it would be too restrictive: a CPE may have 2 outgoing interfaces, one through a "regular" IPv4 path and one through a B4/DS-Lite path. It is OK to NAT on the former path, but not on the later. - Alain.
- [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-dual… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-… Yiu L. Lee
- Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-… Alain Durand
- Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-… Alain Durand
- Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-… Alain Durand
- [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-dual… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-… Ralph Droms
- Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-… Jari Arkko
- [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-dual… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-… Yiu L. Lee
- Re: [Softwires] AD review of draft-ietf-softwire-… Yiu L. Lee