Re: [Softwires] MAP & 4rd-U - Robust Renumbering avoidance (V octet)

Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org> Mon, 06 February 2012 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ichiroumakino@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1432221F8456 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:37:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tpOEx4a0irLt for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:37:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A3D21F8447 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:37:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by werm10 with SMTP id m10so5064531wer.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:37:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=cJ+e98hs4wVsRffnjNYi6rlWRn9J9oEx7OXFpwyyRsA=; b=cpmr1ZAmkIvv0vuqlXZzlaY0pOMYbt4hzeDYr8y4GqEcRdAN+UY/5DPNsNFNLUtMP5 eJkRR4sL9TbDOIANky4BGrmbuy0K3ud5+IZm5h/gwfiAw3mESg9dGK46c5ZJovxob8uz r04jIizIYdpxYUsZrANygzIIzi4BfD0l6Y4yY=
Received: by 10.180.83.70 with SMTP id o6mr657797wiy.19.1328521041044; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:37:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.147.13.62] (64-103-25-233.cisco.com. [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q2sm24070644wiy.7.2012.02.06.01.37.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:37:20 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Ole Troan <ichiroumakino@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ole_Tr=F8an?= <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <F4A250AB-99E5-4F78-BE49-D93475687FE8@laposte.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:37:17 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <99E6AED6-EC3F-43B5-B22D-901085A4B264@employees.org>
References: <B140D6B2-1B19-43D7-9B63-6BEA83CEB164@juniper.net> <3AAD65F3-5169-49B7-9698-E820EF419B35@employees.org> <53ACB4FC-988F-443C-A936-1CA5B13180EB@free.fr> <C694D7DC-2F98-434F-8123-751E2C1A98D0@employees.org> <081C7074-F5E2-46B7-B2C8-E033F3E5BC15@laposte.net> <B94D39A0-CA66-4AE6-BDC5-E4DFA2D47BEC@employees.org> <A8A6FDA2-0FFC-44D2-BEDF-29FB012D3113@laposte.net> <4749FAFA-A522-4795-9B8A-9AA4B030E075@employees.org> <72CC172E-5018-4EB3-ABB0-8591AB0CE3A0@laposte.net> <4E35B2EA-8347-4FA5-9EBC-B0E2A05C2A4A@employees.org> <F4A250AB-99E5-4F78-BE49-D93475687FE8@laposte.net>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Despr=E9s?= <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP & 4rd-U - Robust Renumbering avoidance (V octet)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:37:26 -0000

Remi,

the V-octet and the CNP, have already been discussed on the mailing list, and the design team discussed it with you in person.

the design team made the choice not to incorporate the V octet nor the CNP mechanism in its proposal.

I don't think it is good use of softwire's time to try to convince me yet again that these features are worth adding.

I've made the proposal that we adopts the design team documents as working group documents, as the design team has done what it was chartered to do. and that you write a draft with proposals of what features you want to see added or changed. then the discussion can continue on improving these working group documents.

cheers,
Ole