Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased against static port sharing
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Wed, 18 August 2010 19:49 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2493A6A12 for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.013
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.237, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EI0DU25i6exf for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [91.121.26.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC2A3A69A5 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7IJoHXX001019; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:50:17 GMT (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201008181950.o7IJoHXX001019@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:58:47 PDT. <72C42492-A13E-4E09-A15D-37461907E3BB@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:50:17 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: Softwires <softwires@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased against static port sharing
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:49:43 -0000
In your previous mail you wrote: If we want to remove text that is not strictly protocol related, I'll then suggest we take the entire section 8.4 and the Appendix C out. => +1 Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
- [Softwires] I-D Action:draft-ietf-softwire-dual-s… Internet-Drafts
- [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased again… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Ralph Droms
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Alain Durand
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Ralph Droms
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Alain Durand
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Yiu L. Lee
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Softwires] dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased a… Francis Dupont
- [Softwires] DS-Lite I-D progress (was RE: dual-st… mohamed.boucadair