Re: [Softwires] Comments on 6rd and MAP Multicast
"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Mon, 04 August 2014 20:09 UTC
Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99061A01C8 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N8ZbJgcVbXy0 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (pacdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [69.241.43.119]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 465E71A02D6 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.56.122]) by pacdcavout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id 97wm3m1.109147306; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:09:30 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.7.153]) by pacdcexhub05.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3d40:bdea:7266:7f5a%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:09:10 -0400
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Comments on 6rd and MAP Multicast
Thread-Index: AQHPsB/zeoEQ//EgPkqYjYHlDf9fGg==
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 20:10:28 +0000
Message-ID: <D0055EDD.429CF%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
References: <CAC8QAcdQPMzorq2ra5NO_G9HfXLr-NvErgSW+H6Xg3Li_9AjPQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcdQPMzorq2ra5NO_G9HfXLr-NvErgSW+H6Xg3Li_9AjPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.3.140616
x-originating-ip: [68.87.16.247]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3490013349_1491056"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/rz3aeHUYNtnI72m28SqyIScDKtw
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Comments on 6rd and MAP Multicast
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 20:09:40 -0000
Hi Behcet, Sorry for the late reply. I didn¹t suggest to drop anything. Instead, I just had a question: If the encapsulation method encapsulated v6 multicast packets in v4 unicast packets, it might not be the best use of v6 multicast. Thanks, Yiu On 7/24/14, 6:08 PM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Yiu, > >Can you please clarify your point in today's session? Do you want the >encapsulation or translation parts to be dropped? > >Maybe we can do that but I am not sure if we can say that all IPv4 and >IPv6 access networks are multicast enabled? > > >Regards, > >Behcet
- [Softwires] Comments on 6rd and MAP Multicast Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Softwires] Comments on 6rd and MAP Multicast Lee, Yiu
- Re: [Softwires] Comments on 6rd and MAP Multicast Behcet Sarikaya