Re: [Softwires] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-23: (with COMMENT)

" 杨术 " <yangshu@oudmon.com> Sun, 02 June 2019 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <yangshu@oudmon.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4FB120189 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 08:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VHu3vwiD6e3g for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 08:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbg202.qq.com (smtpbg202.qq.com [184.105.206.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67FA4120094 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 08:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-QQ-GoodBg: 2
X-QQ-SSF: 00400000000000F0
X-QQ-FEAT: ikIOk/X3BrwvzPFN4Cl9fdacOh93ooyGIHhqTvKxpf6v+7a+HmuQwIkwOLr2O Y+uTvwqdDIe2wpaFh5M/duzCknhB1C/m+3URMC3buhWLgKLPTz4slxiM4CyfdOBSOrVicbR JSFdgmddUkHg3vLg7JLVvTP3PQYoXSRyX3h4EfnKHKmHNpx9hjClNVxdWyio4n8ODvzBphG 0nOf28PL2MzzYxwuNc/jNJpmYtfyHNYpa14GLT/LRrnI7jpB6IeR6KAkbZqdx3bIuw5a/eF GBlk/7I68jTqAjcqF+TdS5dg2EeEpOzo7TXMPGs8kMvGLzl8HXkRjdIRnsTOyNAM5OJw==
X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2
X-Originating-IP: 61.51.59.75
X-QQ-STYLE:
X-QQ-mid: bizmailvip4t1559489447t111193
From: "=?utf-8?B?5p2o5pyv?=" <yangshu@oudmon.com>
To: "=?utf-8?B?QmVuIENhbXBiZWxs?=" <ben@nostrum.com>, "=?utf-8?B?VGhlIElFU0c=?=" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "=?utf-8?B?c29mdHdpcmVz?=" <softwires@ietf.org>, "=?utf-8?B?ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1zb2Z0d2lyZS1tZXNoLW11bHRpY2FzdA==?=" <draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast@ietf.org>, "=?utf-8?B?c29mdHdpcmUtY2hhaXJz?=" <softwire-chairs@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_5CF3EBA7_0A701948_0B4E03B2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 23:30:47 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <tencent_180C4C732C463CD775B81A4F@qq.com>
X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent
X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Received: from qq.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with SMTP id ; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 23:30:48 +0800 (CST)
Feedback-ID: bizmailvip:oudmon.com:qybgforeign:qybgforeign1
X-QQ-Bgrelay: 1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/tmEpO9xvuXif08_e8uCj6T3B0N8>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-23: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2019 15:31:06 -0000

Dear Ben,


Thank you for your comments, we reply as following,


 
> §2: Please use the boilerplate from RFC 8174.
 


 
We have replaced RFC 2119 with RFC 8174.
 


 
> §10: "... the security concerns SHOULD be considered more carefully...":
 


 
> That seems more a statement of fact than a normative requirement. I suggest
 
> changing the "SHOULD" to "should".
 


 
We have changed it to “should”.



Best Regards,


Shu Yang




------------------



杨术



欧德蒙科技有限公司






This message may contain privileged and confidential information only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately. 



 
 
 
------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Ben Campbell"<ben@nostrum.com>rum.com>;
Date:  Thu, Sep 27, 2018 05:38 AM
To:  "The IESG"<iesg@ietf.org>etf.org>; 
Cc:  "softwires"<softwires@ietf.org>res@ietf.org>; "draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast"<draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast@ietf.org>ast@ietf.org>; "softwire-chairs"<softwire-chairs@ietf.org>irs@ietf.org>; 
Subject:  [Softwires] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-23: (with COMMENT)

 

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-23: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

§2: Please use the boilerplate from RFC 8174.

§10: "... the security concerns SHOULD be considered more carefully...":

That seems more a statement of fact than a normative requirement. I suggest
changing the "SHOULD" to "should".


_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires