Re: [Softwires] Comments on draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01

Shishio Tsuchiya <shtsuchi@cisco.com> Mon, 25 July 2011 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <shtsuchi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFC311E8079 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_48=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_84=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4faOPY-hlYBh for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FC111E8072 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=shtsuchi@cisco.com; l=2530; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1311564300; x=1312773900; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pCkEDOSg1rR/4gB/uJXcV+sL/lXODpjUx6RNYN+AmLE=; b=XOhj9jkP9qhh/1iRT50biiImT70z1jNgvkW1Ke46ShCVa7bdk0ArHtYB 0ju8ric6eFO08Io/tVPO/4mysEBCz87ElM4qq5LPZMbLHwDI1qD81U/+i Gi4AnERDHZpRPJWqNujdPTHU09FmWxNZNfKOVFgUC8oGFN7KM2hhcz6Vb s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,258,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="5975581"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jul 2011 03:25:00 +0000
Received: from [10.82.236.85] (rtp-vpn5-1105.cisco.com [10.82.236.85]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6P3Ox5I022859; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:24:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4E2CE215.5090408@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 23:25:09 -0400
From: Shishio Tsuchiya <shtsuchi@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: denghui02@gmail.com
References: <CANF0JMAT_ONQLV1E75sA2KjppUqz-3bZVcf2o56X0cjty7nJxg@mail.gmail.com> <4E2A32E1.5090803@cisco.com> <CANF0JMB119Yy2gYTcRa7wK30_r8UrmC6D7XsUr_WWHrefkZ68A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANF0JMB119Yy2gYTcRa7wK30_r8UrmC6D7XsUr_WWHrefkZ68A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Comments on draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:25:01 -0000

Hui
I appreciate your comment.
Hui Deng wrote:
> Shishio
> Thanks for your explaination, just one more comment
> Server based solution will expereience bottleneck once the traffic grows up?
> Regards,

In current datacenter services,user can select type of service by expected traffic.
traffic is small-VPS->Dedicated Server->Housing Service--traffic is huge

In housing service,router based 6rd CE would be fine.
If user would select this architecture,user also can use some native IPv6 technics such as loadbalancing.

I mensioned on section-2.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-00#section-2
 -For Housing users, there are two options.  Either the 6rd CE
function is performed on the Gateway router itself, or the servers themselves can run 6rd directly.

But I felt it need more detail description.
The former is for huge performance request users.
The later is for IPv6 small start users who not needs server load balancer.

Regards,
-Shishio


> -Hui
> 2011/7/22 Shishio Tsuchiya <shtsuchi@cisco.com <mailto:shtsuchi@cisco.com>>
> 
>     Hui
>     Thanks for your comment.
> 
>     Hui Deng wrote:
>      > Hello authors,
>      >
>      > Just wondering how you handle those issues which were mentioned in the draft-jjmb-v6ops-comcast-ipv6-experiences-01
>      > for example,
>      > 1) have you supported Ipv4 any cast?
> 
>     I'm not sure what is issue in comcast case yet.
>     But Sakura is not using IPv4 anycast for 6rd BR now.
> 
>      > 2) implemented DHCPv4 options?
>     We mentioned about this.
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01#section-4.2
>     The server-based 6rd does not needs automatic configuration because the server usually configure IPv4 address statically.
> 
>      > 3) the number of implementations?
>     Many OS already supported 6rd feature.
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01#section-3
> 
> 
>      > 4) Data center normally has high end routers and switches, would that possible to deploy 6rd CE without any influences of performance? you may deployed it on the server?
> 
>     In Sakura's case,switches has high performance for IPv4 switching,but IPv6 switching poor or not support.
>     To provide IPv6 internet without any influence of existing service,Sakura is providing information of server-based 6rd to customers.
> 
>     Regards,
>     -Shishio
> 
> 
>      >
>      > Best regards,
>      >
>      > -Hui
>      >
> 
> 
>