Re: [Softwires] Review of draft-sun-softwire-yang-02

"Hao Wang" <wangh13@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> Fri, 13 March 2015 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wangh13@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EC21A03AB for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 01:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGGgYln8dnvA for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 01:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tsinghua.edu.cn (smtp06.tsinghua.edu.cn [166.111.204.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5371A03AA for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 01:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Hao (unknown [166.111.68.231]) by app4 (Coremail) with SMTP id DcxvpgC3BAlBnQJVDD4HAA--.11827S3; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:18:10 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:17:18 +0800
From: Hao Wang <wangh13@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <951513FB-D0C2-4E72-96DD-222F9CDB4B58@gmx.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA846E1199@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <951513FB-D0C2-4E72-96DD-222F9CDB4B58@gmx.com>
X-Mailer: NetEase Flash Mail 2.4.0.11
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <55029D0D.4090700@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="====003__MESSAGE__ID__54yg6f6h6y456345===="
X-CM-TRANSID: DcxvpgC3BAlBnQJVDD4HAA--.11827S3
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxJrWftryrCr48WrW5uryDWrg_yoW8uFW3pr Z8Gw4DGrW8AF17Ca1xGF18Zw1vvFn5AF4UJrn8Wrn7uay5Xw40vrn0krySkw1DGr4rJF1a vr4Fkws5WFs8GrJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUmYb7Iv0xC_Cr1lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j 6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oV Cq3wAac4AC62xK8xCEY4vEwIxC4wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40Eb7x2 x7xS6r1j6r4UMc02F40E57IF67AEF4xIwI1l5I8CrVAKz4kIr2xC04v26r1j6r4UMc02F4 0E42I26xC2a48xMc02F40Ex7xS67I2xxkvbII20VAFz48EcVAYj21lYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAF wI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0x vY0x0EwIxGrwACY4xI67k04243AVAKzVAKj4xxMxkIecxEwVAFwVW8ZwCF04k20xvY0x0E wIxGrwC20s026c02F40E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67 kF1VAFwI0_Jrv_JF1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY 6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rW3Jr0E3s1lIx AIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JbIYCTnIWIev Ja73UjIFyTuYvj7UU6_fUUUUU
X-CM-SenderInfo: pzdqwxyrt6zthlovh3pvlqwxlxdovvfxof0/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/vNQ8dwRtHY5JL7xrLtCyhqh2NQg>
Cc: softwires <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Review of draft-sun-softwire-yang-02
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:18:29 -0000

Hi Qin,

  Thanks for your review. With regard to your second comment (reference rfc6087), the definitions of the symbols just described in 'draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-01' rather than rfc6087, so we decide to add these symbols definitions in our next version until the bis becomes the RFC and reference it again.

  Regards,
Hao

2015-03-13 

Hao Wang 



发件人:Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
发送时间:2015-03-13 01:12
主题:Re: [Softwires] Review of draft-sun-softwire-yang-02
收件人:"Qin Wu"<bill.wu@huawei.com>
抄送:"softwires@ietf.org"<softwires@ietf.org>

Hi Qin,


Thanks for your comments. Please see inline.


Cheers,
Ian


On 12 Mar 2015, at 08:53, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> wrote:


Dear all,
I have read this document and think the softwire yang model is needed for the configuration and management of Softwire BRs and CPEs.
A few comments below:
In section 3.2, why the binding-ipv6-addr and binding-ipv6-prefix are both contained in the binding-table?


[if] The intention here is to allow for the binding table to be specified in one of two ways, either with an explicit /128 or a /64 with the IID automatically constructed from the IPv4 address and port set.


Looking at the model again, the way that it is currently defined is wrong. Here’s an updated section of the model that should achieve the above: 


   |     +--rw (binding-v6info)
   |     |  +—:(ipv6addr)
   |     |  |  +--rw binding-ipv6-addr    inet:ipv6-address
   |     |  +—:(ipv6pref)
   |     |     +--rw binding-ipv6-prefix  inet:ipv6-prefix







In section 1.1, in RFC6087, I don't see the definitions of the symbols used in these diagrams. Is the reference RFC6087 correct?


[if] Good spot. We’ll remove this reference in the next version.


For the title of "2.3 Lightweight 4over6 lwB4", I think "lwB4" should be uppercase to get consistent with "ATFR”.


[if] The capitalisation in draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6 uses the terms ‘lwB4’ and ‘lwAFTR’ throughout, so the intention is to be consistent with this.





-Qin
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires