IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [softwire]One of the remaining issues in the softwiremulticast.

meng.wei2@zte.com.cn Wed, 03 September 2014 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <meng.wei2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF82E1A892F; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pKTaEZOZ5oJh; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652031A892C; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 27EE4127D2B7; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:23:12 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id s831N0U0048611; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:23:00 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from meng.wei2@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <OF8D565B28.B6BD785C-ON48257D47.00228B80-48257D47.0034FA84@zte.com.cn>
To: meng.wei2@zte.com.cn
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OFD52C595F.C36500A8-ON48257D48.0007657B-48257D48.0007ABBE@zte.com.cn>
From: meng.wei2@zte.com.cn
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:23:00 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2014-09-03 09:22:41, Serialize complete at 2014-09-03 09:22:41
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0007ABBC48257D48_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn s831N0U0048611
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/vW8iwvAGSKobvhXVMGWoT1yPtnY
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, Softwires <softwires-bounces@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [softwire]One of the remaining issues in the softwiremulticast.
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 01:23:24 -0000

Hi, all
  I forgot to attach the link. The link is as below.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext/?include_text=1

Thanks,
Wei


"Softwires" <softwires-bounces@ietf.org>  2014/09/02 17:37:53:

> 
> Hi Softwirers， 
>     There are some softwire technologies already in the WG, and 
generally, 
> there also need some accompanying documents to help the primary 
technology 
> be implemented flawlessly. 
>     So far, there are some primary documents, DHCP Option documents and 
> RADIUS Option documents shown as below. 
>     As can be seen from the chart, softwire-multicast series is not 
complete. 
> These documents all had been adopted as WG doc or became RFCs except 
draft- 
> hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext-05. 
> 
> 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
> | primary documents   |    DHCP Option         |    RADIUS Option | 
> 
+---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> |    RFC 6333         |     RFC 6334           |    RFC 6519 | 
> |(draft-ietf-softwire | (draft-ietf-softwire-  |  (draft-ietf-softwire- 
| 
> | -dual-stack-lite)   | ds-lite-tunnel-option) |  dslite-radius-ext) | 
> 
+---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> | draft-ietf-softwire | draft-ietf-softwire-   |  draft-ietf-softwire | 
> | -map                |  map-dhcp              |   -map-radius | 
> 
+---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> |    RFC 5969         | RFC 5969  section 7.1.1|   RFC 6930 | 
> |(draft-ietf-softwire |                        |  (draft-ietf-softwire- 
| 
> | -ipv6-6rd)          |                        |   6rd-radius-attrib) | 
> 
+---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> ............... 
> 
+---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> | draft-ietf-softwire | draft-ietf-softwire-   |  draft-hu-softwire- | 
> | -dslite-multicast & | multicast-prefix-option| multicast-radius-ext| 
> | draft-ietf-softwire |                        | | 
> | -mesh-multicast     |                        | | 
> 
+---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> 
>     draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option & 
draft-hu-softwire-multicast-
> radius-ext are companion documents. The former provides a method to 
carry 
> "IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes" as a DHCPv6 
> option. Likewise 
> draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext provides a RADIUS option to carry 
the 
> above attributes. 
> 
>     Is there anyone intereted in this topic? Any comments are welcome. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Wei 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email