Re: [Softwires] MAP&4rd-U - DS routing replaced by v6-only routing in hub&spoke topology

Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> Tue, 07 February 2012 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C187F21F8751 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 04:56:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.267, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mPz5U4yIPYA4 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 04:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp22.services.sfr.fr (smtp22.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA7321F8745 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 04:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2206.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BDF4A7000076; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:56:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (per92-10-88-166-221-144.fbx.proxad.net [88.166.221.144]) by msfrf2206.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1970370000BE; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:56:15 +0100 (CET)
X-SFR-UUID: 20120207125616104.1970370000BE@msfrf2206.sfr.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Despr=E9s?= <despres.remi@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <48E1E89C-0CB2-4FE8-B3CB-13D556F46AE1@employees.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:49:14 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <179E0E92-1E0F-414C-87CD-D782B9AF4577@laposte.net>
References: <554901A7-F23C-4197-8783-85D51B502EA3@laposte.net> <48E1E89C-0CB2-4FE8-B3CB-13D556F46AE1@employees.org>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ole_Tr=F8an?= <otroan@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-sfr-mailing: LEGIT
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>, Wojciech Dec <wdec@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP&4rd-U - DS routing replaced by v6-only routing in hub&spoke topology
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:56:18 -0000

Le 2012-02-07 à 13:16, Ole Trøan a écrit :

> Remi,
> 
>> In a use case described in the 4rd-U draft (sec 5.3), an ISP replaces its dual-stack routing by IPv6-only routing.
>> For this, independently from the number of IPv4 prefixes it has to support, it uses only one mapping rule.
>> (By replacing each IPv4 route by an equivalent IPv6 route, it ensures that all customers keep their IPv4 addresses.)
>> 
>> For this to work, the 4rd-U draft has a bit that, in the hub&spoke case, differs between CE-to-BR and BR-to-CE directions. Thus, packets sent to a CE take different routes depending on whether sent by a CE or a BR.
>> 
>> I don't see how the equivalent could work with the MAP documents you edited.
>> Is it that such a use case is out of scope for MAP?
>> Or did I miss something?
> 
> injecting IPv4 routing into the IPv6 routing table is considered a bad idea. that was what caused Automatic tunnelling and IPv4 compatible address in RFC1933 to be deprecated.

- Reference?
- Should we take it, then, that you reject moving from DS routing to IPV6-only routing without address/prefix changes as a use case you are interested in?

RD


> 
> cheers,
> Ole