Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16
Xiaohong Deng <dxhbupt@gmail.com> Wed, 05 October 2016 08:56 UTC
Return-Path: <dxhbupt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E405D127A91 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 01:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_10_20=0.093, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37HQITmTUQNo for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 01:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46A901294B7 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 01:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id j69so182898951itb.0 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 01:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=M4oMRxBD0Hv+XCD566/bfGNfohzKDvvDNm5Ryca8Amc=; b=GxYvuQRE1syXgupmL4SkMqbAVRcckdwf3NHFzyIChh1fRH2qSKReu0Kxrc6p8Sfvoa 6XOTS6M+ud73Jn17rguISwCABminpbhUW8/iMEx5SG9yRe4YaNRfUNghB5CX0ppRMV9q vx8Dscdhy8b4lpr4aF58s3uQlU684tw1wab6X/70ARg1IPU8OQX2orXQV4FJae2TON6g i2TkVUsZfojKLVM7e4GehLN9WGN6SUbl14n2F0XaRb551m37X3RICpjlLPm6i+Ho6CwU MvCrIH3NkavYO0YCPh5jOhzUhIKiBWzJQ96Z5FCzoR2s33VsN/W+Ff0nVd9jRvmh52Rr W+9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=M4oMRxBD0Hv+XCD566/bfGNfohzKDvvDNm5Ryca8Amc=; b=LxmUnRB/cNwkXWx6GUmsWBuuqNeg3Zf6iUNoQHFK8b4/i9se6P/6qHi9zZdNp0Jrkz savo/e7I50PiWVAWXGoTFYV2Y2vU3JkgTqd9yuvqDxoywPT6eOLEksWj1zD6Mfs5sIu+ 7/ieRDn4nuFznjWBAbymaZtlwsQUECqPNdk5dDFSd3tkvlkLvft0IlYDONJRp0u76nlP QLbDYUKZj9eSkEWKOTHJ1a7bVfpmpmiyS8GaYKD6KsnY9WZtGOV6q3G4MjQGqXpTe97R mon6ziDjAFQCC/mMN7Ht01FU9oQxBfrJwfni3RrhWbt1RJAqt+P7+vjm9nUPEgf+LPtE gkSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rl5WJjrjwWGwloYlPz9g1RJ7GF/cgJbtwEA+PX9mWhT6F19CDVPGwPlx+wq4fyp/+QYvNS14gucIgQLQg==
X-Received: by 10.36.110.197 with SMTP id w188mr27521617itc.114.1475657814180; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 01:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.158.195 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 01:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Xiaohong Deng <dxhbupt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 19:56:53 +1100
Message-ID: <CANb4OcmRSNW6=piCCZqHT2my0qHJ_3vUVZg4xZE78uMC8tAQtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>, "<christian.jacquenet@orange.com>" <christian.jacquenet@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114ab17ed307fd053e1a5b19"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/wx9P_t3StUfwAF6hzzpq80I6hic>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 08:56:58 -0000
Hi WG, I'd like to second Christian's comment. IPR declaration is clear to my eyes and shall not be a reason stop it from moving forward. Actually this document has been waited too long in the WG queue to be processed. Most of us know that in the past few years, WG's been struggling on many aspects and caused a long queue, due to various reasons - technical or non-technical hinders. Hence, if there are any more reasons to delay this one, it'd better be fair enough and make good sense to the community. On a personal note, a lot people in a wider community have been concerning about IETF's efficiency - 5 years time to produce a RFC is unbelievable to them, under the circumstance that the world and technologies are changing so fast every day now. People here may or may not be aware of that concern. We shall listen and it's to change for better, IMHO. Kind Regards with my 2 cents. Xiaohong On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:49 AM, <softwires-request@ietf.org> wrote: > <christian.jacquenet@orange.com> Tue, 04 October 2016 07:50 UTCShow header > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/Rt0BYmnMiqaR6XuIb6PDQGhD3I8#> > > WG, > > Let me second Med's comment. > > I think the text of the patent is indeed pretty clear in citing the draft as prior art and therefore fail to understand how this patent can apply to draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast. > > I therefore suggest the draft moves forward. > > Cheers, > > Christian. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:37:18 +0000 > From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@comcast.com> > To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, Ian > Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com>, softwires <softwires@ietf.org> > Cc: "draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org" > <draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 > Message-ID: <98489954-21A1-4AE2-BE7B-10F9E7F7AE12@comcast.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I support to move forward. > > > > From: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> > Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM > To: Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com>, softwires <softwires@ietf.org> > Cc: "draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org" < > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org> > Subject: RE: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 > Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org> > Resent-To: <christian.jacquenet@orange.com>, <jacni@jacni.com>, < > mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>, < > wangqian@chinatelecom.cn> > Resent-Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM > > > > Re-, > > > > As mentioned in another message, I don?t see how this IPR applies to the > draft given that the patent itself cites the softwire draft in the prior > art! > > > > I support the draft to advance in the publication process. > > > > Cheers, > > Med > > > > De : Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Ian > Farrer > Envoy? : mardi 4 octobre 2016 09:39 > ? : softwires > Cc : draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org > Objet : [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 > > > > Hi, > > > > A few weeks back, we sent out an question asking the WG their opinion on > how to proceed with draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast in light of the > IPR disclosure. No responses to this question were received. > > > > According to RFC3669, in order for a draft with an IPR disclosure to > advance there needs to be consensus of the WG. No response is not consensus > to proceed. > > > > In light of this, we ask the WG again for their opinions on how to > proceed. If insufficient support is shown, then work on the draft will > cease. > > > > Please respond by 18th October. > > > > thanks, > > Yong & Ian > > > > Details of the IPR Disclosure are at: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2873/ > > > > United States Patent # 9,014,189 > > Date Granted: April 21, 2015 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/attachme > nts/20161004/ec3ae5b1/attachment.html> > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: smime.p7s > Type: application/pkcs7-signature > Size: 4259 bytes > Desc: not available > URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/attachme > nts/20161004/ec3ae5b1/attachment.p7s> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:49:02 +0200 > From: Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com> > To: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@comcast.com> > Cc: softwires <softwires@ietf.org>, > "draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org" > <draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 > Message-ID: <D7B002AD-A14A-4BAE-B073-E22F294B4A9F@gmx.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi Yiu, > > Can you provide some information about the reasoning behind your support? > > I have spent some time today reading the case studies in section 4 of > RFC3669, and it would be useful to know if you think that any of these are > applicable here and why. > > Thanks, > Ian > > > On 04 Oct 2016, at 16:37, Lee, Yiu <Yiu_Lee@comcast.com <mailto: > Yiu_Lee@comcast.com>> wrote: > > > > I support to move forward. > > > > From: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>> > > Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM > > To: Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com <mailto:ianfarrer@gmx.com>>, > softwires <softwires@ietf.org <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>> > > Cc: "draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org <mailto: > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org>" < > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org <mailto: > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org>> > > Subject: RE: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 > > Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>> > > Resent-To: <christian.jacquenet@orange.com <mailto: > christian.jacquenet@orange.com>>, <jacni@jacni.com <mailto:jacni@jacni.com>>, > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>>, < > yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com <mailto:yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>>, < > wangqian@chinatelecom.cn <mailto:wangqian@chinatelecom.cn>> > > Resent-Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM > > > > Re-, > > > > As mentioned in another message, I don?t see how this IPR applies to the > draft given that the patent itself cites the softwire draft in the prior > art! > > > > I support the draft to advance in the publication process. > > > > Cheers, > > Med > > > > De : Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org <mailto: > softwires-bounces@ietf.org>] De la part de Ian Farrer > > Envoy? : mardi 4 octobre 2016 09:39 > > ? : softwires > > Cc : draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org <mailto: > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org> > > Objet : [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 > > > > Hi, > > > > A few weeks back, we sent out an question asking the WG their opinion on > how to proceed with draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast in light of the > IPR disclosure. No responses to this question were received. > > > > According to RFC3669, in order for a draft with an IPR disclosure to > advance there needs to be consensus of the WG. No response is not consensus > to proceed. > > > > In light of this, we ask the WG again for their opinions on how to > proceed. If insufficient support is shown, then work on the draft will > cease. > > > > Please respond by 18th October. > > > > thanks, > > Yong & Ian > > > > Details of the IPR Disclosure are at: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2873/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ > ipr/2873/> > > > > United States Patent # 9,014,189 > > Date Granted: April 21, 2015 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/attachme > nts/20161004/70a970ee/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Softwires Digest, Vol 131, Issue 2 > ***************************************** >
- [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question… Ian Farrer
- Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure ques… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure ques… christian.jacquenet
- Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure ques… Lee, Yiu
- Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure ques… Ian Farrer
- Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure ques… Xiaohong Deng
- Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure ques… Jacni Q
- Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure ques… Tina Tsou