Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAT-E/T?
Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org> Sun, 28 September 2014 09:07 UTC
Return-Path: <cyrus@openwrt.org>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DBE1A1A2A for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 02:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ymN0p3BugkfU for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 02:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chi.subsignal.org (cxd-2-pt.tunnel.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f14:ed::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E048E1A019C for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 02:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.104] (p54B7806D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.183.128.109]) by chi.subsignal.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A6291260A3; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:08:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5427CFCC.9090709@openwrt.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:07:24 +0200
From: Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Poscic, Kristian (Kristian)" <kristian.poscic@alcatel-lucent.com>, "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
References: <7921F977B17D5B49B8DCC955A339D2F04690CD3A@US70UWXCHMBA06.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <7921F977B17D5B49B8DCC955A339D2F04690CD3A@US70UWXCHMBA06.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030101010301080504060709"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/z0d55sris0_QOOkiDbhX9-KoUfQ
Subject: Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAT-E/T?
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:07:29 -0000
Not precisely CE vendor, however the latest bleeding edge OpenWrt and the upcoming release has (experimental) support for LW4o6, MAP-E, MAP-T and the corresponding DHCPv6 provisioning mechanism. Just download a snapshot-image for a platform of your choice and install the map / map-t package respectively to try it out. Regards, Steven > Hi there, > > Are there any CE vendors that have implemented (or at least have firm > plans to implement) either MAP-E or MAP-T? > > Thanks. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
- [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAT-E/T? Poscic, Kristian (Kristian)
- Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAT-E… Shishio Tsuchiya
- Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAT-E… Steven Barth
- Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAT-E… Armstrong, Bill R