[solace] Will this IRTF group proceed?
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 14 March 2013 03:53 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: solace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: solace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B0221F8C3B for <solace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.399, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24qbbo98rVcc for <solace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A42B21F87CC for <solace@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [70.193.196.66]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7E722065 for <solace@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:53:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sandelman.ca (quigon.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A2BCA0CF for <solace@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:24:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: solace@ietf.org
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:24:28 -0400
Message-ID: <7047.1363231468@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: [solace] Will this IRTF group proceed?
X-BeenThere: solace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Smart Object Lifecycle Architecture for Constrained Environments\" discussion list" <solace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/solace>, <mailto:solace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/solace>
List-Post: <mailto:solace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:solace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/solace>, <mailto:solace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:53:29 -0000
We are now at the second meeting after we concluded that we needed something like SOLACE. Are we any closer to forming a specific group? While many of us have been focused on security, I think that there may be some other things that could benefit from a a clearer lifetime process. I am thinking in particular of various phases outlined by the ROLL industrial applicability may mandate rekeying of the network between phases. I'm not sure that I'm satisfied with an IRTF group. -- Michael Richardson -on the road-
- [solace] Will this IRTF group proceed? Michael Richardson
- Re: [solace] Will this IRTF group proceed? Carsten Bormann