Re: [solace] Slides posted for SAAG heads-up

[Robert Cragie <[e-mail]>]

I think the point is you could choose any number of scenarios and 
providing they are well-researched and understood, any of them would 
serve as a starting point. Where it starts to go wrong IMHO is trying to 
start with a number of disparate scenarios and in the first analysis 
phase trying to distil some common understanding and architecture from 
all of them. I think it makes more sense to start with one and I think 
that Carsten's suggestion is more representative of the challenges 
facing device lifecycle and is therefore a good starting point.

I would then move forward in an incremental fashion whereby at each 
increment we:

 1. Introduce a new scenarios
 2. Aim to describe it using the architectural concepts developed for
    the previous scenarios
 3. Refine the architectural concepts

Robert

On 07/11/2012 11:36 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2012, at 18:29, Rene Struik <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> industrial control
> Too easy.
>
> This is usually a highly controlled environment, where there already are defined business relationships.
>
> Try a home occupied with a family with a 13-year old son, where the lifecycle later involves, say, a divorce and a foreclosure.
>
> (I like the industrial scenario, but I think we should do that later.)
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> solace mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/solace
>