Communication received from OIF

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 22 March 2009 04:30 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data0@psg.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:36:00 +0000
Message-ID: <EC2967A0CD724E309D8E02F87FF61D5F@your029b8cecfe>
Reply-To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Communication received from OIF
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:30:57 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

I fumbled this incoming communication that arrived at the end of February.

You can find it at and the attachment at 
http://www.olddog.co.uk/incoming.htm

Adrian
...

Dear Adrian and Deborah,

We have been working on multi-domain restoration requirements in the Carrier 
Working Group in OIF.

The attached document includes mutually agreed requirements from multiple 
carriers. It focuses on restoration across multiple domains, and presents 
several failure scenarios. It considers intra-domain restoration, 
inter-domain restoration, and the coordination required across multiple 
domains for each case. It represents an addendum to the previously sent 
requirements document (oif.2006.134.02), and it focuses on multi-domain 
service recovery using E-NNI interfaces.

As we continue work on multi-domain restoration, we would appreciate if 
CCAMP will take these requirements into consideration in further CCAMP work 
on GMPLS recovery.

We will be happy to have a dialog with CCAMP, if you have any questions or 
comments on these requirements.

Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
Lyndon Ong
OIF Technical Committee Chair