RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15
"Malcolm Betts" <betts01@nortel.com> Tue, 10 March 2009 19:33 UTC
Envelope-to: ccamp-data0@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:34:48 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:33:52 -0400
Message-ID: <0BDFFF51DC89434FA33F8B37FCE363D5165DA369@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
Thread-Topic: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15
Thread-Index: AcmhtdnTQFH7ICg+RzC0PxIN6VwSqAAANKQQ
From: Malcolm Betts <betts01@nortel.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Adrian, I don't like either paragraph.... The point I was attempting to raise, and I think Enrique made a similar point, is that we should phrase the liaison to stimulate a discussion with the experts in Q6 on the value of making measurements on active optical paths. Malcolm Betts Nortel Networks Phone: +1 613 763 7860 (ESN 393) email: betts01@nortel.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 3:17 PM To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org Subject: Re: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Does anyone else have an opinion on the difference between these two paragraphs... > However, if a service provider chooses to measure optical link > impairments on an out of service basis and this can be achieved within > ITU-T standards , then this should not be prohibited by the CCAMP > protocol mechanisms, and the communication of the information > collected should be accommodated within GMPLS" > However, if an implementer chooses to measure impairments on their > device, and this can be achieved within the mechanisms and definitions > defined by the ITU-T, then this should not be prohibited by the CCAMP > protocol mechanisms, and the communication of the information > collected should be accommodated within GMPLS. There are several differences: - state impairments are "optical impairments" - limit impairments to "link impairments" - restrict discussion to "out of service measurements" - refer to "ITU-T standards" rather than "mechanisms and definitions defined by the ITU-T" Thanks, Adrian
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 O'Connor, Don
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 O'Connor, Don
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 O'Connor, Don
- Re: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Adrian Farrel
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Malcolm Betts
- Re: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Dan Li
- Re: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Giovanni Martinelli
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 O'Connor, Don
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Malcolm Betts
- Re: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Adrian Farrel
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Young Lee
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Malcolm Betts
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Adrian Farrel
- RE: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 O'Connor, Don
- Re: Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Greg Bernstein
- Re-Updated Draft Liaison to Q6/15 Adrian Farrel