Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 14 August 2021 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAB13A2830 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 13:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rl_2y9Kq8YHx for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 13:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B45183A282F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 13:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D54300BFD for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:52:11 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id zeKjMVqKX1nT for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:52:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE2803002A6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:52:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:52:08 -0400
References: <CBE95F06-7678-4D63-B39E-D66DDFC2906D@vigilsec.com>
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CBE95F06-7678-4D63-B39E-D66DDFC2906D@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <D99E74D7-08C5-4851-8B98-A1F3746C9B74@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/-VmWdkIvFRDvlNjz-gGxL5WBgyI>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 20:52:18 -0000

It looks like September 13th is preferred.  We will make the decision on Monday or Tuesday.  If you have not responded, please do so now.

Russ


> On Jul 31, 2021, at 4:04 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> We did not include PQC on the agenda for IETF 111 because we wanted to dedicate a whole virtual interim to the topic.  This pool is to find a time in the first two weeks of September.  Please provide your availabily promptly so we can get the meeting scheduled.
> 
> 	https://doodle.com/poll/3m8ca2yyfvttb78w
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
>  Russ
>