IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter

Daniel Van Geest <Daniel.VanGeest@isara.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <Daniel.VanGeest@isara.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B321274D0 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:10:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jT7bxJr3Fpi7 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:10:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esa1.isaracorp.com (esa1.isaracorp.com [207.107.152.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD556129C6A for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown (HELO V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com) ([10.5.8.20]) by ip1.isaracorp.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2018 16:10:44 +0000
Received: from V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com (10.5.8.20) by V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com (10.5.8.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.1466.3; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:10:43 -0500
Received: from V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com ([fe80::d802:5aec:db34:beba]) by V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com ([fe80::d802:5aec:db34:beba%7]) with mapi id 15.01.1466.012; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:10:43 -0500
From: Daniel Van Geest <Daniel.VanGeest@isara.com>
To: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter
Thread-Index: AQHUdk0lICeW2g/VwEakcZ4bh1yW9KVEzLuA//+vifk=
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:10:43 +0000
Message-ID: <8kdd765b8opl9g2k9otmadmt.1541607041579@isara.com>
References: <3653FE62-CD11-47D1-A9DB-5C6FF4AD8498@vigilsec.com>, <a16fc5d404404b33b633fc9698580014@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <a16fc5d404404b33b633fc9698580014@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-CA
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8kdd765b8opl9g2k9otmadmt1541607041579isaracom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/-zKEq0XktGPtWbUZirY4uz2G4U8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:10:47 -0000

We have no IPR disclosures for this draft. We're not aware of any 3rd party ones.

From: pkampana@cisco.com
Sent: November 7, 2018 10:59 AM
To: housley@vigilsec.com; spasm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter


1) Yes
2) Yes
3) No. Probably in the long run.

I would also like to know if there are any IPR disclosures related to this draft.

Panos


-----Original Message-----
From: Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Russ Housley
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 10:51 PM
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Subject: [lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter

The SECDISPATCH WG met on Tuesday afternoon, and they made this recommendation:

>  draft-vangeest-x509-hash-sigs-01 -- re-charter LAMPS WG to accept this draft

Three questions:

1) Do you support the addition of this work to the LAMPS charter?

2) If it is added, would you review the document?

3) If it results in an RFC, would you implement?

Russ & Tim
_______________________________________________
Spasm mailing list
Spasm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

_______________________________________________
Spasm mailing list
Spasm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email