IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter

Hernâni Marques (p≡p project) <hernani@pep-project.org> Wed, 07 November 2018 05:16 UTC

Return-Path: <hernani@pep-project.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3619130DCC for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 21:16:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKGlEgGVGobP for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 21:16:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dragon.pibit.ch (dragon.pibit.ch [94.231.81.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5186A127333 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 21:16:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.pibit.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D55B171C06C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:16:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dragon.pibit.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dragon.pibit.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqWQWZG1uRPE for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:16:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.43.177] (unknown [1.46.42.239]) by dragon.pibit.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4132171C057 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:16:46 +0100 (CET)
To: spasm@ietf.org
References: <DC188C55-6FDE-4E64-9151-54815E96B50B@vigilsec.com>
From: "Hernâni Marques (p≡p project)" <hernani@pep-project.org>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <86978dd6-0218-1c59-9302-70e2548dbe80@pep-project.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 06:16:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DC188C55-6FDE-4E64-9151-54815E96B50B@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PW0x8FsvIj7uRzl0FAwKk6McWc2pOP0zJ"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/03oqRjbhcwIvWXLmYmztaCYSdhk>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 05:16:55 -0000

Hello Russ

On 06.11.18 04:34, Russ Housley wrote:

> Three questions:
> 
> 1) Do you support the addition of this work to the LAMPS charter?

Yes.

> 2) If it is added, would you review the document?

Yes.

> 3) If it results in an RFC, would you implement?

For incoming messages in any case (for interop) in pEp implementations
(for now: Android, iOS, Outlook and Enigmail/pEp mode), for outgoing
messages depending on the final specification.

Greets

Hernani

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email