IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] CAA erratum 4515

Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F543129B59 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.295
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sleevi.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tKpLhZT5FhvU for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a113.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 075E3129A9B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a113.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a113.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A032A30002724 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sleevi.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=sleevi.com; bh=77wEXsXEtQlw3RcUlTHK9gNuLnU=; b= BCEUjgkofnLpX2Fb9b4XHw42fz4dmeahrrjDj37xbSM8EC5pYcZSyj52Gebw6I9l ZyADbjrj7Zo7nqYUSFGuo58ypJChT0OGayu5R3+7SpM0Rotpq80K1hTaRYGBK6QB MUTAzoXuJeCLm0MThlLPFOkwIPfOuf5mpzseKFlFzf4=
Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com (mail-lf0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ryan@sleevi.com) by homiemail-a113.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 740D43000271F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a6so26677732lfa.0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0Vs9CUy1lbrqym42QRT6cuOUmwgG1A0TkpxFvMH7lBBAvgIDYQyV3LxvNuwBMpE2gTUwU1CJMxucW6Mg==
X-Received: by 10.25.204.9 with SMTP id c9mr3108678lfg.107.1489706628658; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.193.197 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e2e8e857-51d6-5138-ab66-4f3f4cff1590@eff.org>
References: <79cf5707-693e-abf0-9e35-5dcc94a3e877@eff.org> <CAErg=HFtk0EKASTpWwNVhcT4zk2+ei-KPv=cMYDQej2oGJi=rw@mail.gmail.com> <9c55abf5-b81b-d9cb-c88c-7ea5bc6390c8@eff.org> <CAErg=HGT7FyDKgm8cAUojhGDOzLUkn=bw1Xdghbqnxw-79zQiw@mail.gmail.com> <20170311201904.GQ7733@mournblade.imrryr.org> <fede5d8f9f2c43518d8a3c502c60558a@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <389a248f-37e4-9ff7-b330-b840e7c47931@eff.org> <CAErg=HEC=YL-wWEygqtmivN0axZ_cddkM-WDc8RA+jVTJYmVgQ@mail.gmail.com> <0d7afa83-a9d7-f977-ca36-533fc13b720e@eff.org> <CAErg=HF2WnSYtxs6r_svx-zCmt8ApkVsg6R7cezaYO=3WoVKQA@mail.gmail.com> <7129a939-35f1-f55b-703b-9f39f6110520@eff.org> <CAErg=HESLRQU=vg3sOFhBoBas7bBmL-z4ZkeeXOLD+y60OU5NA@mail.gmail.com> <e3384bdd6e5f4529b3b1d8abf7b32b83@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <e2e8e857-51d6-5138-ab66-4f3f4cff1590@eff.org>
From: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 19:23:47 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAErg=HF3cDWyufLYPE8sUsNMZei-1yS1Tw1dvpMPC+u67HemQw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAErg=HF3cDWyufLYPE8sUsNMZei-1yS1Tw1dvpMPC+u67HemQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>, Patrick Donahue <pat@cloudflare.com>, Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>, Peter Bowen <pzb@amzn.com>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1a1c826bc01e054ae15a6a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/0n3Jiv-VhI_93bVZohh32hFrs5w>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] CAA erratum 4515
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:23:52 -0000

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> wrote:

> On 03/15/2017 07:46 AM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>
> Agreed. I think the lack of 'client' override - and apologies for my own
> ignorance here, as I couldn't find where the exclusivity was stated that
> ONLY a CNAME record may exist - is a pretty compelling argument against the
> tree climbing.
>
> While I disagree with some of the points below, I think this is the key
> argument about why recursion-into-CNAME-and-tree-climb may not be
> desirable - because it affords less control in the default configuration,
> and makes it easier to misconfigure.
>
> Great. So should I take it that you are now in support of revising the RFC
> to specify non-tree-climbing behavior?
>

Yeah, I think the issues related to expressing policies highlight why
tree-climbing is probably not desirable for actual CAA deployment.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email