Re: [lamps] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku-05: (with COMMENT)

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

> On Aug 25, 2022, at 03:14, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku-05: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Section 7 as worded is a little confusing, though I managed to figure out what
> it's trying to say.  I suggest it get a once-over before it goes on to the RFC
> Editor.  If you need some suggested text, I'd be happy to provide some.

I think this might be OBE. IANA made the assignments and I forgot to include them in the -05 version. I made a PR to include the OIDs and also modify the IANA considerations section:
https://github.com/lamps-wg/documentsigning-eku/pull/19/files
Is this better?

spt